My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC06278
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC06278
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:02:23 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:25:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1992054
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
3/8/2004
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DMG
To
Fesco Inc.
Inspection Date
2/25/2004
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-1992-054 <br />INSPECTION DATE 2/25/04 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS RCO <br />This inspection was pertormed by the Division as part of its monitoring of Construction Materials 110 permits. The site was <br />inactive at the time of the inspection. <br />The site was secured by a locked gate (stock sections) at the entrance near the county road. Nomining-related or reclamation <br />activity has been carried out at the site in several years. The only changes noted since the last inspection (pertormed at the <br />time of the amendment which added over 5 acres to the west end of the permit) consist of pit slope erosion, placement of <br />additional debris and additional non-mining-related equipment in the pit, and the spread of the knapweed infestation. These <br />items will be discussed below. <br />There was no permit ID sign posted at the entrance or anywhere in the pit, though that is required by Rule 3.1.12. Likewise, <br />there were no permit area boundary markers noted, though those are required also, under the same rule. The lack of the <br />required sign and markers is noted as a problem in this report under the topic of "signs and markers." The corrective action is <br />to post an ID sign (containing all required info described in the rule cited above), and adequately mark the boundary in a <br />durable and visible manrier (such as t-posts at the corners). See the last page for the correction date. <br />The site has been inactive for almost 5 years, but that is not yet a problem (refer to Rule 1.13, Temporary Cessation). The <br />topic of "general mine plan compliance" is noted as a problem in this report since there has been continued placement of more <br />and more debris and non-mininc-related equipment in the pit . This is not an approved part of the minino plan, and it adds to <br />the reclamation liability of the operator. There is a choice of corrective actions to this problem: applyfor a technical revision to <br />the permit's mining plan, or remove the debris and equipment from the pit floor, or prepare for submitting additional bond (in an <br />amount to be determined by this office). See the last page for the correction date. <br />The pit is bounded by irrigated agricultural land on N and W. Irrigation pipes lie on the ground on the north side of the pit, near <br />the permit boundary line. What appears to have been an ongoing leak from a loose joint or misaligned lines has caused <br />surtace gullying and subsurtace piping of the soils on the pit slope. The soil has been carried to the pitfloor. and has left a hole <br />in the slope to fix. The damage caused by past erosion is noted as a problem under the topic of "soil erosion" This will <br />continue to occur unless the operator corrects the problem by eliminating the pipe leak, shaping and compacting the slope, and <br />providing for adequate upland drainage control. See the last page for the correction date. <br />There appears to be a new roadway dozed down to the creek bed from the NE corner of the permit area. Since this is out of <br />the permit area, and it is not part of the approved plan in the file, it is not clear if this road is related to the permitted mining <br />activity, the landowner's agricultural activity, or related to gas well activity. Offsite damage related to mining activity may <br />constitute a possible violation to the permit. At this time, however, until this problem is corrected, through this office receiving <br />page for the correction date. <br />There is agricultural land surrounding the permit area, and much of the undisturbed land in the permit area is still used for <br />agriculture. Noxious weeds (knapweed patches) have been noted on the site in the past, and the former permittee was <br />required to implement a weed control plan. It does not appear that the present noxious weed control plan has been effective <br />submit a more effective plan and the commitment to implement it. The plan must be submitted soon, but the actual <br />implementation of weed control practices must occur at the proper times during the season. (Note: This plan must be in place <br />before the growing season begins. Implementation must begin in 2004; delay will allow further spread of the weed, which <br />increases reclamation costs.) See the last page for the correction date. <br />No further items were observed during the inspection. All questions or responses to this inspection report should be directed to <br />the Division of Minerals and Geology, 701 Camino del Rio, Room 125, Durango, Colorado 81301, Attn: Bob Oswald; phone no. <br />970-247-5193. <br />Cont. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.