Laserfiche WebLink
_ ~ <br />~~. <br />^r ~~ ~ <br />-AIE OF INSPECTION: June 4, 1981 <br />~ iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />GEi :ql.'.1 E^li OF +.ATURAL RE $OURC°$ <br />;,. ?don;e Pnseon. 2.ac.,:~.,a J •e.:' ,r <br />)I L1EI) L.~\D RED;I~11i_1"TIOti <br />=23 Czntznniai Builcmg, t3t3 Sherman Street <br />Dznver. Coloraao 80203 Te1.13031866-1767 <br />David C. Shelton <br />Director <br />NOTICE OF INSPECTIONd <br />:,ND <br />INSPECTION P.EPGRT <br />NAME OF OPERATOR: Weld County <br />c/o Wayne Smyth <br />ADDRESS: Department of En ainr~e tine <br />~. v. Bn,< 75 3 <br />Greeley, Colorado 80631 <br />RE: FIIE NO.: sD-149 Imo: r/okestra Pit <br />(Phase note the instructions indicated by <br />an X Co [he right.) <br />;Io problems noted a[ tine of inspectio:. <br />~s a reminder, be sure to file your <br />.annual Report or \otice of Intent to <br />Continue on the Permit ?.nniversary Date <br />~~ Possible problem(s) -Rote recommenda- <br />tion(si below to avoid further comolice <br />bons or possible violation(s) at the <br />time of the next inspection. <br />Possible violation(s) -vote recotmnenda <br />don(s) below and reply to the Divisior. <br />by [o avoid <br />enforcement action. <br />Possible violation(s) pose(s) an <br />immediate threat oL harm to the <br />environment, public welfare, or <br />continued operation. Enforcement <br />action forthcoming. <br />0&SERVATIODIS OF PIPORTAN~: <br />1. 100 foot wide berm between n:vrc and site apuears r:~nnnletr•, .rr. rlrn~s the 50 foot wide <br />berm between the operation and the adjacent landowner. <br />2. First berm placement between ~onnectinc7 pone?s hos ~l•.•t to Ar- cunstnrcted. <br />3. Concrete rubble and mixed dei~ris ~r~. causinr, injury to the root ,levelopmont of several <br />cottonwood trees due to compaction. Ph:chanical injury to the trees I:ns also observed. <br />4. Slight bulge in the S00 foot berm is apparently mirroring the opposite bank. Some <br />erosion to the south bank at the cast~-v~nmost curl of tlrc~ b~vm i:; occurring. <br />5. Anchor to the berm was in pLic~~:. C.'urnpos~~d of ciurnDlr rock (yrani te). <br />6. Disposition of topsoil unclear. Tnla;oi.l stncl:pi le:: <br />volume-remain unclear. <br />7. No recent evidence of activity in the St. l~rai.n r,-rrs <br />indicated that the 100 foot berm was created r,•ith .St. yr <br />~~~ -~, ,~, material, as indicated in tL~° penru t. <br />supposition, however, the staff reqursts the operator to <br />i.~~rr a<~ri fi rrl, but the extent and <br />oir.:erved. T/:e adjacent landowner <br />tin Creek material and not pit <br />']o e~~idence as yet confirms this <br />clarify the m,~tter. <br />8. On-site personnel have no knowl<•d~u~ of Chr, permit r<~rlui rernr~nt~c. <br />RECOP1hfENDATIONS <br />1. Please submit a release from the f'.S. ,lrm:; Corps or l:nginc~~rs at the final completion of <br />the 100 foot berm since this activity I;.r.: under their r?; rr~cr.ion throu•rl; tl;e :Od permit. <br />2. Please contact the Division as to the ?ucr~••s;; nr f,ri l nn~ of tLe ~i r~:t l:crm placement <br />between connecting ponds. <br />CONTINUED ON ATTAClfED SIIF,ET <br /> <br />Inspected by: /~~ r.: ~' .1 , <br />Reclac~ticxi ~oecali=t <br />BJjmt ' <br /> <br />