My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC05690
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC05690
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:01:13 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:23:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
3/5/2007
Doc Name
Insp Rpt
From
DRMS
To
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold
Inspection Date
2/27/2007
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORIGINAL-PUBLIC FILE <br />(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #: nn-teRn-sac <br />INSPECTION DATE: ~/~7/n7 INSPECTORS INITIALS: <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />The Division conducted a bi-monthly inspection of the site on 1/3/06.The main purpose of <br />the inspection was to collect a split sample from POND 4A, prior to CC&C submitting a pad <br />decommissioning request for pads the old Iron Clad/Globe Hill pads. Present during the <br />sample collection was Lawrence Meyers of CC&V. <br />A Split sample for Metals sulfate and wad cyanide were collected. Samples delivered to <br />CDOH&E lab the next day. ALL SAMPLES WERE KEPT IN A COOLER WITH ICE PRIOR TO DELIVERING TO <br />CDOH&E LAB. <br />After the sample collection, with Mark Vanoni OF CC&V, present, the Valley Leach facility <br />was inspected. Along the access road to Phase IV low volume solution collection a <br />discussion was held about having that area re-surveyed again to make sure it is not a low <br />area that could cause some future erosion problems along the anchor trench. Mark said he <br />will request the area to be surveyed once he gets a chance to look at the as built <br />drawings. <br />Inspected the Phase I, II, II&IV Leach pad areas and collected the following readings from <br />the High and Low Volume Solution Collection Transducers. <br />Phase I High Volume Solution Collection Transducer #1 was recorded at 7.0 (read out meter <br />still not functioning) #2 was at 39.2 and # 3 was at 39.4. Piezometer for the pond was at <br />43.5 feet. Low Volume solution collection transducer #1 was recorded at .23 and # 2 was at <br />0.58. <br />Phase II &III High Volume solution Collection transducer # 4 was recorded at 14.2 # 5 <br />was at 13.6 and # 6 was at 14.5. Piezometer for the pond was at 29.1 feet. Low volume <br />transducer # i was at.03 and #2 was at.63. Piezometer for the pond was at 28.7 feet <br />Phase IV High Volume Solution Collection Transducer # 7 was recorded at 14.0, #8 was at <br />15.0, #9 was at 15.5 and # 10 was at 14.9. Low Volume transducer # 1 was at 11.3 and # 2 <br />was at 8.3 inches of hydrostatic head. <br />Inspected the External pond, it was holding a small amount of what appeared to be <br />partially frozen water .Low volume Solution Collection transducer # 1 for the pond was <br />recorded at 11.7 and # 2 was at 12.9 inches of hydro static head. <br />Inspected the under drain area, both the south and 4 inch pipes were discharging at lower <br />cfs than was observed during the last inspection. The north under drain and solid 24 inch <br />pipes were dry. All lower ponds were holding about the same amount of what appeared to be <br />frozen water covered with snow as was noted during last inspection. <br />Note: All transducer readings are in feet of hydrostatic head unless otherwise noted. <br />I & E Contact Address <br />NAME: TIM COMER <br />OPERATOR: CCBV cc. r CE <br />STREET: P_(~_Bt7X t9t <br />r BL <br />CITY/STATE/ZIP: vtcme,cni ~ann~ Rna~n r FS <br />r HW <br />r HMWMD (CH) <br />r <br />r SE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.