My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC05341
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC05341
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:00:00 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:21:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980189
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
10/20/2005
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DMG
To
El Paso County
Inspection Date
9/15/2005
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
jPage 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #: nn_i9gn_ino <br />INSPECTION DATE: con+amFiar 15 ~nn5 INSPECTOR=S INITIALS: A IW <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This was a full warranty release request inspection conducted by Tony Waldron of DMG along with Ernie Shonts <br />and Bruce Taylor of EI Paso County Road and Bridge. The site is located approximately 9 miles south of Yoder, <br />Colorado. <br />The pit is situated at the head of a sizeable natural drainage just where the contributing watershed begins to <br />drop off of an upland area and cause down-cutting as the actual drainage begins. The pit extends well below <br />the elevation of the original channel bottom thereby causing the pit to capture water prior to its release as it <br />quickly infiltrates. All of the slopes are re-graded at the appropriate grade of 3H:1 V or flatter. The south, east <br />and west sides are exhibiting fairly good geo-technical stability, unfortunately, the north side of the regraded <br />pit is exhibiting some significant erosion features in the form of down-cutting gullies. Contour terraces have <br />been installed oround the inside slopes of the pit. These are demonstrating to be most effective along the east, <br />west and south pit slopes, however, the north slope is cutting through the terraces as water drains across and <br />down these slopes. <br />The revegetation effort across the pit would have to be termed spotty at best. Several areas are exhibiting <br />good grass establishment, however, the northern side in particular is very poor. The operator has attempted to <br />re-seed on more than one occasion; however, this area is just not taking very well. A discussion was held about <br />changing the seed mix to include some species that are more adapted to the sandy soils. Also, it may be <br />necessary to include more aggressive species that will quickly establish but eventually give way to the native <br />grasses. Since the site is not fully stable or fully revegetated, it cannot be released at this time, therefore the <br />request is being denied. <br />There seems to be 2 main problems that may be difficult remedy. The first is that the backfilled material is very <br />sandy and therefore not very resistant to erosion or very suitable for the establishment of vegetation. The <br />second is that water from above the pit is naturally directed to a point above the pit slope will always want to <br />run right down this slope. An upland diversion may help keep water off of the slope until vegetation con <br />become established, however, once water is allowed to drain naturally, it will head right back over the slope <br />and likely cause down-cutting due to the fact that the backfill and topsoil are composed mainly of sand. Even <br />now, the terraces are incapable of holding and properly diverting water off of this north slope. Once the <br />topsoil/sand becomes saturated is simply collapses and allows water to head to the next down slope terrace <br />where the same thing occurs until it reaches the pit bottom. <br />A couple of suggestions that were tossed around on site were to modify the seed mix to a more aggressive mix <br />containing introduced species that may establish more quickly while still allowing the native grasses to come in <br />over a longer period of time. Second, instead of continually fighting the erosion by re-grading and backfilling <br />the down-cut area, the area where water wants to run naturally should be allowed to develop into a <br />permanent drainage. This could be accomplished by accepting the fact that water will droin down the slope <br />in this area in perpetuity. The area could then be widened out and a series of drop structures could be installed <br />with moderate armoring of the channel bottom while trying to get the sides to revegetate. If the runoff <br />velocities could be reduced or better managed, the down-cutting should attain some state of equilibrium that <br />everyone can live with. The critical point in this plan will be the transition point from the relatively level and <br />undisturbed upland area above the pit to where it begins its descent Across the backfilled slope. If this area <br />can be thoughtfully designed and installed the rest of the drainage should develop over time. However, if this <br />area is not properly installed head cutting will continue unabated until the drainage finds its own gradient <br />which will allow for overland transport of water without serious down-cutting and erosion. In any event a <br />technical revision will need to be submitted to the permit application revising the seed mix along with that <br />portion of the reclamation plan dealing with surface water drainage. This will be cited as a problem on page <br />three of this report along with corrective action dates. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.