Laserfiche WebLink
Memo to Christine Johnston <br />West Elk Coal Refuse Compaction <br />page 2 <br />Technical Background <br />The regulations require that coal refuse structures be compacted <br />and that the operator provide quarterly testing results to attest <br />to compaction in accordance with the specific design specs for the <br />structure. Compaction control involves two basic steps: (1) <br />Determining the comparative standard for the specific soil being <br />compacted (Proctor test); and, (2) determining the field density <br />achieved at the structure. The compaction of a soil (moisture - <br />density relationship) is quantified in terms of dry density <br />achieved versus the maximum dry density determined by an arbitrary <br />standardized test procedure called the Proctor Test, named for its <br />Corp of Engineer's inventor. There are actually two Proctor Test <br />standards, the "normal" and the "modified". Each of these <br />procedures has at least four sub-methods (A, B, C & D). In greatly <br />simplified version, the "normal" procedure is used for fine to <br />coarse-grained soils or processed aggregates of silt, sand, gravel, <br />or crushed rock which will be exposed to moderate compaction loads. <br />The "modified" is used for coarser granular materials which will be <br />exposed to greater compactive effort to achieve design-required <br />high density. As in the case of most coal refuse structures, MCC's <br />lower refuse pile is required to apply the "normal" proctor <br />standard method for compaction control. <br />The different sub-methods are intended to deal with different size <br />gradations, generally coarser materials as you move from A to D. <br />Experience has shown that the limitations of the testing apparatus <br />effect the test results. As the soil being tested becomes coarser, <br />the large pebbles interfere with compaction of the sample. To <br />compensate for this effect, a larger diameter test mold is used, <br />the larger fraction is removed (greater than 1/4 inch), or the <br />larger fraction is replaced with an equivalent weight of material <br />in the size range from 1/4" to 3/4". This is a gross <br />simplification. For the actual requirements see section 5 of the <br />attached copy of ASTM Standard Method D-698. <br />The West Elk coal refuse, like most Colorado non-wash plant <br />generated coal refuse, is a hybrid mixture of contaminant competent <br />rock, including roof rock, partings, and floor rock, mixed with <br />reject coal. The reject coal tends to be relatively low density, <br />65 to 80 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), while the contaminant rock <br />tends to be contrastingly higher density, 115 - 130 pcf. As a <br />result, changes in the proportionate mix tends to significantly <br />alter the density of the composite soil material. Therefore it is <br />important that the competent coarse fraction be included when <br />determining the proctor compaction standard for West Elk coal <br />refuse. Candidly, my review of the pre-1995 West Elk compaction <br />reports suggests to me that the coarse fraction was not <br />