Laserfiche WebLink
Bebw are comments on the hnpectbn. The commenth Include discussbn of obsenaHoro made during the <br />inspsetbn. Comments also describe any enforcement aetbro taken during the impecflon and the loch or <br />evidence supporMg the enforcement action. <br />Items of concern from the previous inspection: There has been collapse at the airshaff <br />located to the north of the upper portals (NW'/. NW'b Sec 35, T7N, R89W). This feature is <br />appro>amately 30 feet bng,15feet wide, and 10 feet deep drrecliy (apparently- over the <br />vertical shall. Gafrectlon of this feahre has been recommended to AML <br />This report was completed from aerial photographs talaen by Mr. Harry Ranney, <br />Environmental Protection Specialist, wish the Division, and an oral debriefing of Mr. Ranney, <br />by Byron G. Walker The photographs, 46-001 ~1-1, 2 and 3, are on file at the Division. <br />Hydrologic Balance: The site u covered with snow. No water is visible in the sedimentation <br />pond. No flaw is evident in the clear~vater intercepts dffch. There does not appea to be <br />any water quality problem. <br />Suncotf Facilities: On-site support facilities consist of a clew-water intercepts ditch and a <br />sedimentation pond. Atihough covered with snow, both of these facilities appear to be in <br />good condition. <br />Air Resource Protecflon: The site is covered wish snow. There is no source of fugitive dust, and <br />there is rto oictiviiy on site that would confibute to air pollution. <br />Slides and Damage: See the carry-0ver comment above concerning collapse at the arc <br />intake shall. The aerial photogroptu do not cover this fan shaft site. The reworked fllb and <br />embankments (see inspection report of 17 November 1999) appeor b be in good shops. <br />~[dg~; there is no evidence of subsidence to the areas covered by the photographs. <br />• The reclamation work accomplished by AML appears to be successful. <br />P.a. ~ of ~ Pap.e, (date) to Februerw 2000 (tnitiele) ~~ <br />