My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC04182
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC04182
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:58:54 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:14:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978039HR
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
MINERALS PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
7/10/1997
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• (Page 21 • <br />MINE ID N OR PROSPECTING ID A M-78-039 <br />INSPECTION DATE 07/10/97 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS RCO <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This inspection was conducted by the Division as part of its monitoring of 110 metal mines, and as a result of the recent transfer <br />of the permit from Energy Fuels Nuclear Inc. to International Uranium IUSAI Corp., since the financial warranty amount must be <br />reassessed. The operator was contacted about the inspection, and a time was arranged to meet first at his office in Dove Creek <br />then proceed to the site. The operator was present throughout the iunspection. <br />The permitlD sign, required pursuant to Rule 3.1.12, was observed to be posted on the entrance gate at the eastern boundary. <br />Access to the site is gained by an access road which connects to a road within the nearby Carnation Mine (permit no. M-77-4161. <br />The 9.75-acre permit area is roughly rectangular, and mainly consists of the pad at the portal, including the buildings area, ore <br />stockpile area, waste dumps, and topsoil stockpiles. The permit area does not extend much dawn the hill to the north, or up the <br />hill to the south. There are no portions of the permit area le.g., vent holes) located apart from this area. The size of the onsite <br />features has not apparently grown much in the past few years, and all activity is still considered to be contained within the boundary. <br />The markers were not readily visible from the pad. Though required to be posted to adequately delineate the boundary, this is not <br />being noted as a problem in this report, mostly because this is a new permittee and the site has only recently been reactivated. The <br />operator should note however, that the ID sign should be updated to reflect the new permittee's name and the corners must be <br />marked. The onsite operator, Mr. Smith, requested a copy of the original permit map, a copy of which is attached to his copy of <br />this report. <br />Several years ago there was a pile of radioactive ore on the pad (approximately 1,OOOcubic yards), but the pile had been removed <br />completely by the time of this inspection. The metal building is still present, as well as overhead electric power, a steel culvert-style <br />portal shed with grated opening, and one ail tank and diesel tank leach approx 400 gallon cap.). Though there was no secondary <br />containment at all, the tanks were empty, and there was no evidence of spillage or leakage. Other features onsite were <br />miscellaneous pipes and timber platforms, and a wheeled spray rig. <br />The map indicates two sizeable topsoil storage areas. One pile was found on the SW side of the building, though the amount in <br />it was small. It is recognized that topsoil is scarce in this area, and that much pre-law activity occurred without consideration of <br />topsoil salvage. The topic of topsoil in this report is not considered a problem, but the operator should make every effort to salvage <br />and protect all topsoil encountered in the reactivation of the site, for later use in reclamation. This includes any type of growth <br />medium. <br />The dump pad is graded to contain stormwater, with atwo-foot berm at the edge of the top and a contour channel graded into the <br />native material at the toe. The slope drainage leads to a small sediment pond (20' x 30'1. The slope gradient is 40 degrees, and <br />still shows evidence of the erosion observed several years ago during a previous inspection. (The material used in the lower <br />containment berm and other nearby native material is one possibility for a source of topsoil to be used in reclamation. Since the <br />cut slope above the pad is low, most dump material will be graded down to attain the maximum 2:1 slope. This will cover much <br />of the land downslope of the present foorprint of the dump. Stripping of this material can create volumes of it to be placed <br />elsewhere.) <br />Covering much of the top of the pad surface was a crop of Halogeton glomeratus, an annual weed commonly found on disturbed <br />areas in this region and soil type. It has the characteristic of being toxic to sheep. Though it is doubtful that sheep will be grazing <br />here, and future mining activity may even kill all the weed present, this note is being made for the information of the landowner and <br />the operator, since control of the weed may be needed and spread of the plant would be undesirable. <br />The bond will be recalculated soon, and the figures sent to the operator for review. Because it will be based on present disturbance <br />and reasonable future activity, and must account for addressing all earthwork and structures, the operator may influence the amount <br />by communicating to this office any changes on the site. As always, development work and reclamation should be fully reported <br />to this Division on the annual report. <br />There were no other items noted or discussed. If there are questions about this report, please contact this inspector at the address <br />or phone shown below: <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />484 Turner Dr. ,Bldg. F-101 <br />Durango CO 81301 <br />Phone: 970/247-5193. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.