Laserfiche WebLink
(Page 3) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #: M-1985.003 <br />INSPECTION DATE. 312312006 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: CMR. HHP <br />Reclamation Plan and make the case for keeping the slopes on the east and south side as a <br />they are. The inspection revealed that while the pond and nearby berm/levee slopes are <br />greater then 3:1, the areas have good vegetative production (willows, cottonwoods, grasses, <br />etc) that could effectively control erosion from wind, rain, and waves. Were vegetative <br />production is not as well established, along the west and northern side of the pond, the slopes <br />would still need to be graded to a slope of 3:1 or less. <br />• The affected area within the mine permit boundaries were not well marked. This was problem <br />noted in the last inspection as well. This is particularly a problem in an area along the western <br />edge of the site were the mining activities maybe close to the affected area boundary. The <br />affected area within the permitted mine require boundary markers (Minerals Rules and <br />Regulation 3.1.12 (2)). <br />