Laserfiche WebLink
III. COMMENTS - COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of <br />observations made during the inspection. Comments also describe any <br />enforcement actions taken during the inspection and the facts or evidence <br />supporting the enforcement action. <br />This was an aerial inspection flown on July 16, 1998. The four photographs <br />taken were examined on July 20, 1998. The ground appeared dry. <br />HYDROLOGIC BALANCE <br />Sedimentation Ponds <br />Both ponds appeared full of water. The ponds' embankments and inslopes <br />appeared stable, and no gullies were evident. <br />With the exception of the slump area (see following discussion), the <br />reclaimed areas appeared to have good vegetative cover that is just <br />beginning to brown up. <br />SLIDES AND DAMAGE <br />The work appears to have been completed in the slump area in the <br />southeastern portion of the reclaimed pit area. This work was approved in <br />MR-13. During last month's inspection a trench had been excavated. Now, the <br />trench has been backfilled and the area has been regraded leaving an area <br />of bare soil. All equipment has been removed from the site. There was no <br />sign of movement on the slump. <br />The scarp near coordinates N377,000; E1,498,750 appears in one of the <br />photographs as it was described in last month's inspection report. It <br />appears to indicate minor settling along the hillslope and does not appear <br />to represent significant ground instability. <br />- 3- <br />