Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />c <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID#: M-1990-098 PAGE: 2 <br />INSPECTION DATE: 10-9-01 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: ACS <br />The Division of Minerals and Geology has been finalizing the review of the <br />amendment AM-Ol application to the Perry Pit mined land reclamation permit. <br />The final technical issue to be addressed prior to approval of the application <br />is the proposal to eliminate construction of the side channel spillway that <br />is required under the approval of the original (1990) application. In the <br />Applicant's adequacy response letter dated September 21, 2001, several issues <br />are discussed supporting the conclusion that a side channel spillway or other <br />flood control measures will not be necessary to protect the Perry Pit and <br />prevent redirection of river flow energy through the excavations. The <br />Division's position on the points raised in the adequacy response will be <br />enumerated below. The purpose of this inspection was to evaluate the <br />Applicant's determination that the sinuosity of the river channel is confined <br />by a historic levee in the reach where the channel bends toward and within <br />approximately 220-feet of the south end of the pit. As the river flows north <br />from this closest point of approach to the pit, it also moves away from the <br />pit to the east. At a point approximately 800 feet south of Weld County Road <br />6, the riverbank is more than 400 feet from the mining limits and is <br />aggrading. As a result, the potential for damage to the north half of the <br />proposed pit during a 100-year flood is greatly diminished. <br />This inspection was focussed on the area east of the south half of the pit <br />where an outside bend of the river is approximately 220 feet from the mining <br />limits (see the diagram included as page 5 of this report). At this location <br />an eddy has developed at the approximate midpoint of the outside river bend. <br />The western edge of the eddy pool is the closest approach of the river water <br />to the pit. Just south of the eddy, the left riverbank is undercut and <br />ezoding. The historic levee is located just to the west of the riverbank, and <br />is in relatively good condition above the eddy and for a few tens of feet to <br />the north of the eddy. The crest height of the levee drops as the structure <br />proceeds north, and it was determined that if the levee were to be overtopped <br />during a flood, the overtopping would occur initially at a location to the <br />north of the eddy, at the approximate location illustrated on the included <br />diagram. This assumes that the levee will not have already failed by some <br />other mechanism prior to overtopping flows. The low point of the crest of the <br />levee has been reinforced by past landowners through the installation of <br />embedded tires. <br />The reinforced low point in the levee will serve to control the location at <br />which a flood will low onto the Perry Pit property, as long as the levee holds <br />until overtopping occurs. Based on the geometry of the levee, the likely <br />spill point at the crest of the levee, and the proposed mining limits of the <br />Perry Pit, it was determined during this inspection that damage to the pit <br />slopes during a 100-year overtopping flood event would be minimal. This is <br />due to several factors, including: <br />