My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC03151
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC03151
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:58:02 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:09:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1976027
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
3/7/2005
Doc Name
Insp Rpt
From
DMG
To
Nielsons Inc.
Inspection Date
2/28/2005
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-1976-027 <br />INSPECTION DATE 2/28/05 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS RCO <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This partial inspection was performed by the Division as part of its monitoring of Construction Materials 112c permits, and to <br />discuss possible revisions the operator is considering at the site. The operator's representative named on page one was <br />present during the inspection. <br />The required permit ID sign was posted at the entrance to the processing and stockpile area at the permit. Numerous permit <br />boundary markers were noted along the boundary. A few appeared to be missing, either because they would be within the <br />landowner's hayfield and would impede the agricultural operation, or due to some recent stormwater berming near the scales <br />in the stockpile area. Though this is not noted as a problem, the operator must endeavor to accurately locate and install all <br />missing markers there (and elsewhere along the boundary, as applicable). These must be in place before applying for any <br />changes, especially if revised maps are involved. <br />The upcoming changes being considered by the operator include a change to the scale location, a slight realignment of the <br />access road, and a possible amendment for additional land for excavation or on which fo set up a hot mix plant. The operator <br />stated that the scale and road are sometimes used by the landowners in their ranch operation. <br />The site was active at the time of the inspection. Equipment noted onsite included wheeled loaders, haul trucks, <br />conveyors/slackers, crushers and diesel power plant, all being operated. <br />The mining plan is phased, and the operator is following the approved phases. Excavation was occurring in the southeast part <br />of the pit, with crushing occurring in the pit and processed product being conveyed up to the filled bench level west of the pit for <br />stockpiling. Highwalls are steep on the north and east sides of the pit, and are nearly 100 feet high in places. There is a large <br />percentage of reject material generated during processing, and deep overburdens, both of which materials are used in the pit <br />backfilling. Such fill was used for creating the west stockpile bench. There were several large stockpiles of various materials <br />west of the pit, including base course and clean gravel for asphalt production, which contained tens of thousands of yards and <br />filled the stockpile area. Given the depth of the pit, the proximity of the north and south boundaries, and the amount of <br />backfilling already performed on the west, the pit floor is not large enough at this time to be able to accept more backfill <br />material. Until the active highwall (on the east) advances further, space far operations will be limited. Eventually, backfill in the <br />pit will raise the rest of the pit floor to an elevation about 30 feet higher than it is now. <br />The salvaged overburden and topsoil are bermed along the top of the north highwall, along the west permit boundary, and <br />mainly above the east highwall. The pit has not expanded to the eastern permit boundary yet; the boundary is still another200 <br />feet east of the pit. To mine further to the east will require that a significant amount of overburden and topsoil must be moved, <br />as well as the removal of the pinon and juniper vegetation. <br />A portion of the north inslope of the pit, just east of the ramp road into the pit, has been sloped and topsoiled. The gradient <br />appears to match the reclamation plan, but vegetation is still incomplete there <br />The bond amount is $94,693, and is the amount calculated at the time of approval of TR -02 four years ago. Another bond <br />calculation will be performed by this office and, if an increase is indicated, the figures will be sent to the operator for review. <br />No further items were observed during the inspection. Responses to this inspection report should be directed to the Division of <br />Minerals and Geology, 701 Camino del Rio, Room 125, Durango, Colorado 81301, Attn: Bob Oswald; phone no.970-247-5193. <br />I & E Contact Address cc: Harry Posey, DMG <br /> ^ CE <br />NAME Craig Wickstrom ^ BL <br />OPERATOR Nielson's Skanska. Inc. ^ FS <br />STREET PO Box 1660 ^ HW <br />CITY/STATE/ZIP Cortez. CO 81321 ^ HMWMD (CH) <br /> ^ SE <br /> ^ WOCD (CH) <br /> ^ OTHER <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.