Laserfiche WebLink
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made during <br />the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection and the <br />facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />This was a complete inspection of the Carbon Junction Mine conducted by Tom Kaldenbach and Wally <br />Erickson of CDMG. No one represented the operator during the field portion of the inspection. Matt <br />Gavin of Goff Engineering and Surveying was present during the records check at the Goff office. The <br />gravel operation was inactive on the site. Mazcia Talvitite of Four Corners Materials went along on the <br />inspection. Snow cover had melted from most of the permit area, but the ground was wet and muddy. <br />The Division is reviewing a bond release application SL-2 for Phase I, II, and III release of the coal <br />reclamation bond for the South Pit area and other azeas that aze part of the Ewing Mesa gravel pit <br />permit. The approved post-mining land use of the SL-2 azea is industrial (gravel pit). <br />Availability of Records <br />All required records were available (see attached list). <br />Siens and Markers <br />The mine i.d. sign is properly displayed at the entrance. <br />Roads <br />The North pit haul road is surfaced with cobbles. The road is rough, but passable. Water bars that cross <br />the road discourage public access. The road extending up the north side of the South Pit reclamation is <br />gullied. This road is part of the SL-2 bond release area, but is part of the Ewing pit gravel permit and will <br />be the reclamation responsibility of the gravel permittee. <br />The gravel that washed down from the North Pit access road to the fill area at the south end ofthe road has <br />been regraded. Also, sediment has been cleaned out of the double-culvert next to the main haul road. <br />Hvdroloeic Balance <br />Pond 1(large pond) -The pond was not dischazging. The water level was approximately 1 foot below the <br />orifice in the drop inlet. The water was a few feet deep throughout the pond, which is a historically high <br />water level for this pond. Most of the year this pond is usually dry. The flume, embankment, and inslopes <br />were in good shape. <br />Pond 2 (small pond) - A discharge of less than 25 gpm of clear water was passing through the flume. The <br />flume, embankment, and inslopes were in good shape. <br />Backfill and Gradine <br />No further backfilling has been done in the North pit since 2003. <br />