Laserfiche WebLink
„~yn - <br />:~ <br />~T3> <br />'3~,. <br />t ., <br />t <br />i <br /> <br />i <br />1 <br />i ~ ~% <br />li r~l ~1 fl:~ ' ~ Jf ' ~ - ~ <br />2- <br />RECEIVED <br />To Whom It May Concern: MAR 2 8 2001 <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />I am writing this letCer with my concerns about the <br />Camas USR 877 and USR 1046 permits. As you can see from my <br />scaled map, I live in the middle of the Camas USRs. <br />What I would like to say first, I am not opposed to <br />responsible mining, I am opposed to unresponsible mining. <br />Reviewing the map ycu can see that a possible 3.5 miles <br />of river ( St. Vrain and Boulder Creek) will be disrupted <br />for 15-20 years, not including the 14yrs. to present. I must <br />say agian I am not opposed to responsible mining. As you <br />can see on the map, a yellow marker showing the conveyer system <br />from C.L.Rd.#1 to the east end of section 16. This is my <br />opposition. Why as a property owner do we liave;.to,:deal with <br />this negative impact. This does not have to4"•happen`:FThe, USR <br />877 permit needs°to be reclaimed, then.the~-USR 1046-should <br />be.min~~d. To have the St. Vrain-Boulder Creek confLv.ence <br />mined at the same time, it is to hard on the enviroment. <br />As neighbors, we have battled with the effects of the mining. <br />AIR QU~ILITY, NOISE, TRAFFIC, NEGATIVE PROPERTY VALUES, <br />ENVIROIIENTAL EFFECTS, not to mention miles of unreclaimed <br />river I~ottom. This is not an attempt to stop the mining, <br />it is yin attempt to get it under control before its to late. <br />The St<ite of Colorado 34-32-102 Legislative Declaration <br />is not being conveyed to myself my family and or my neighbors. <br />Please take a close Look at my concerns: <br />Thanks Ted L. Cox <br />17b7 WCR 20.5 <br />Longmont, Co 80504 <br />cc DMG Michael Long <br />cc DOW Larry Rogstad <br />cc Lon€;mont City Council Marty Block <br />cc Welcl Co. Planning Ann Johnson <br />