Laserfiche WebLink
~. <br />;• .,. <br />w, _ ~- <br />~~ ;: <br />r <br />~ ~ . _~ r. ~ <br />nn-~y~oa~ <br />RECEIVED <br />To Whcm It May Concern: MAR Z g 2001 <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />r <br />I am writing this letter with my concerns about the <br />Camas USR 877 and USR 1046 permits. As you can see from my <br />scaled map, I live in the middle of the Camas USRs. <br />What L would like to say first, I am not opposed to <br />responsible mining, I am opposed to unresponsible mining. <br />Reviewing the map you can see that a possible 3.5 miles <br />of river ( St. Vrain and Boulder Creek) will be disrupted <br />for 15-20 years, not including the 14yrs. to present. I must <br />say agian I am not opposed to responsible mining. As you <br />' can see on the map, a yellow marker showing the conveyer system <br />from C.L.Rd.#1 to the east end of section 16. This is my <br />>.,:-. <br />:~.,_^ ; <br />opposition. Why as a property owner: do we have to 'deal,iaith <br />_ this negative impact. This does not' have' to.'happen~The;, USR_ -~;=~ - <br />877 permit.needs°ro be :reclaimed, then~theUSR 1046 should <br />be.minsd. To have the St. Vrain-Boulder Creek confluence <br />~ mined .st the same time, it is to hard on the envroment. <br />As neighbors, we have battled with the .effects of the mining. <br />AIR QUALITY, NOISE, TRAFFIC, NEGATIVE PROPERTY VALUES, <br />ENVIROINENTAL EFFECTS, not to mention miles of unreclaimed <br />river Bottom. This is not an attempt to stop the mining, <br />it is .in attempt to get it under control before its to late. <br />The State of Colorado 34-32-102 Legislative Declaration <br />is not being conveyed to myself my family and or my neighbors. <br />1 <br />Please take a close look at my concerns: <br />I Thanks Ted L. Cox <br />1767 WCR 20.5 <br />' Longmont, Co 80504 <br />cc DMG Michael Long <br />cc DOW Larry Rogstad <br />cc Longmont City Council Marty Block <br />cc We1ci Co. Planning Ann Johnson <br /> <br />