INSPEC02731

• Permit No: M1989029
• IBM Index Class Name: Inspection
• Doc Name: MINERALS PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT
• Inspection Date: 4/26/2001
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

~
°
'ii~
~ ~
1
!~
< ~
' ~~/
.`.y
-; Rec:Laimation Problem;

;+ 1) :: have labeled several pictures showing the reclamation
Eroblems thaC concern us.
2) ): have also Tabled several compl eted reclaimation projects
from the surrounding area. These projects were started
well after the CandM project and are all reclaimed.
3) Various pictures show reclaimation practices not suitable
for the area.
Future Mining Plans (Camas)
1)Camas has amended there original permit several times,
with no conclusion of there original permit.
2)Camas current operation is located '~ mile west of Boulder Cr.
What they plan ( to save them money ) is to leave there
current plant in place and set up a three quarter mile
of conveyer. This conveyer would boarder the north side
of three neighboring property owners. They would then
convey the material accros the river behind our property
to the exsisting plant. Completion time 15-20 years.
This is not.in.agreement with the..Tu11 Property.Permit.
3)Camas is also negotiating with the City of Longmont on
ano.ther.,permit. `
In Conclusion
1) I have copied sections from the Colorado Mined~I>and Act.
i ?S•. .
2)' I have copied sections of case number Amended USR=877
C:sndM Distel Farms Permit for your review.
3) Itt several attempt to work out our problems and concerns
w::th Camas, no reasonable effert has been made by
them to meet us half-way.
4) Tttis is an attempt to make aware the situation that
this area has lived with for far to. many years.
P1ea;;e contact Ted Cox with any questions and or conclussions
concerning this matter.
1767 W.C.R. 202 Longmont, Co.
303-651-1203
cc; k'eld County Planning
Division of Minerals and Geology
City Council, Longmont
E.P.A.
Sincerely ~~1. ~,/
r
~.ya,
,.. ;.:.
+_,