My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC02481
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC02481
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:57:38 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:05:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
6/10/1997
Doc Name
FAX COLORADA FY 1997 OVERSIGHT REVIEW ENGINEERS REPORT NEW ELK MINE PERMIT C-81-012
From
SUSAN BURGMAIR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiiii iii <br />Colorado FY 1997 Oversight Review <br />Engineer's Report <br />New Elk Mine <br />Permit C-SI-OIZ <br />Review Topic: Caal Mine Waste Banks <br />Field Review Date: June 10, 1997 _ <br />a <br />Review Team: Kent Gorham, Reclamation Specialist, DMG a <br />Ron Sassaman, Program Specialists, OSM s <br />Glen Golden, Civil Engineer, OSM <br />Scope of Review ~ <br />The scope of review is specified in the ofTicial oversight document, entitled 'Attachment to the <br />Oversight Agreement" (the Agreement), dated 12/18/96. On page A-7 of the Agreement, the <br />following statement is made: 'Each operation witft a coal mine waste bank has a water control, <br />construction, and reclamation design sufficient to ensure long term reclamation success." To be <br />consistent with this statement, no permit documents were evaluated for adequacy. Instead, DMG <br />(Kent Gorham) and OSM (Ron Sassaman) used the three criteria given in the Measurement <br />section of the Agreement (page A-7) to determine compliance with the permit intbrmation. My <br />involvement in the field review was to determine if the till structures were stable; and if there were <br />any conditions that mould likely lead to instability. <br />Evatuntion Methods <br />As specified in the Agreement, operator inspection reports, construction and maintenance of <br />water control structures, and waste pile construction requirements were checked by the inspectors <br />to determine permit compliance. <br /> <br />_~ <br />My evaluation was limited to visual observations, including assessing the following, when <br />applicable: flow from underdrains, seeps, soft or we[ areas, surface drainage and erosion, <br />sediment load of discharge water, cracking at the crest and along the slopes of the fill, bulging on <br />the slope or near the toe, shallow surface movement (e.g., creep and slippage), boils below the <br />fill, and settlement and depressions. <br />Fill Structures Evaluated <br />Two fill structures were evaluated. One is the Development Waste Pile (DWP) tf~al is located <br />south of Highway 12, and immediately west of the road that runs from the mine entrance to the <br />mine office. The other fill structure, the Refuse Disposal Area (RDA), is located north of <br />Highway 12 and directly north ofthe coal processing plant. <br />S /I ~:90I8Z•ER6 -[u c n rwcc-nr~ ~c_o~_, ~~ .,-,o_ ~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.