Laserfiche WebLink
• (Page 2) • <br />MINE iD # OR PROSPECTING ID # <br />INSPECTION DATE 09/25/98 <br />The following observations were <br />The final Proctor tests on the u <br />were made during this site visit <br />M-94-117 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS CLK <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />made during this inspection of this 8.4 acre 110(2) site. <br />stream raise to the dam, and the final compacted dam layers, <br />Observations of the procedures were recorded at this time. <br />Density and moisture tests were done by Jim Riley of HP Geotech, using a nuclear densipmeter <br />(stan.dard Troxler 3430) and sand-cone testing tools (6" frame, pre-measured sand, cone, and <br />digging tools). Five sample areas, approximately 100 feet apart and staggered across the <br />dam, were tested with the nuclear densiometer, and three of those areas were tested with the <br />sand cone equipment. These locations were noted by the tester by their distance from a power <br />pole east of the dam, and were reasonably close to previously tested sample locations. <br />The nuclear densiometer tests were taken at 6" and 12" in depth. A hole was made with a <br />standardized frame, measuring stake, and hammer, then the nuclear densiometer was placed into <br />the Y~ole and readings taken. Care was taken for all observers to remain 3' away from the <br />machine while it was taking readings, so as not to confuse the moisture gauge. Measurements <br />were taken for 1 minute, with the following results noted by the DMG inspector: <br />1) 6" 134.6 PCF, 7. 7$ mc; 12" 137 PCF(pounds per cubic foot), 7.3$ moisture content <br />2) 6" 128 .7 PCF, 3. 9$ mc; 12" 126. 7 PCF, 4.2$ me <br />3) 6" 131 .8 PCF, 5. 1$ mc; 12" 134. 5 PCF, 4.9$ me <br />4) 6" 126 .4 PCF, 4. 4$ mc; 12" 133. 1 PCF, 4.1$ me <br />5) 6" 124 .4 PCF, 4. 8$ mc; 12" 130. 1 PCF, 4.7$ me <br />These numbers will be compared to pre-set curves derived from laboratory tests of the various <br />soil types present in the dam, and to the soil dug up from the holes in question after the <br />nuclear densiometer tests were taken. Comparisons will be made to ascertain that the level <br />of cc•mpaction for these densities and these moisture contents is above 90$ for each soil <br />type. From the first look, using the most conservative curve derived for these values, it <br />appears that all of the measurements indicate compactions well above 90$. <br />Three sand cone tests were done at locations 1, 3, and 5, using holes 4.5" to 8" deep <br />(depending on how deep it was possible to dig the hole without collapsing the cylindrical <br />surface). The soil was dug out and stored in sealed bags for moisture content testing at the <br />lab, and the hole which had been dug out was filled with fine, pre-measured sand. Care was <br />taken to keep the digging frame flush with the ground, and all equipment operation was halted <br />while the sand was filling the holes, so as to prevent excess settling of the material in the <br />hole. <br />It appears that all tests were conducted with the care necessary to obtain accurate results. <br />Copies of the results are to be sent to DMG as soon as possible. <br />I & E Contact Address <br />NAME Maxine Stewart <br />OPERATOR ITEC Environmental <br />STREE'T' 707 17`" Street. Suite 310 <br />CITY/.STATE/ZIP Denver, Co 80202 <br />cc: Carl B. Mount, DMG <br />^ CE <br />^ BL <br />^ FS <br />^ HW <br />^ HMWhID (CH) <br />^ SE <br />^ WQCD (CH) <br />^ Other <br />Ted Gengler, ITEC (see above) <br />