My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-11-21_INSPECTION - M1978208
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1978208
>
2005-11-21_INSPECTION - M1978208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2020 11:10:26 AM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:03:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978208
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
11/21/2005
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DMG
To
Aspen Enterprises
Inspection Date
10/17/2005
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 3) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #: ti+-~ oast-~nst <br />INSPECTION DATE: Ctr+ober ~ ~, inns INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: -~ <br />The following problems (PB) and/or possible violations (PV) (and suggested corrective actions) were identified <br />during this inspection. The problems should be corrected by the dates given, or they will become possible <br />violations. The possible violations should be corrected by the dates given to reduce their severity when considered <br />by the Mined Land Reclamation Board. The inspector noted on the previous page should be notified of all <br />corrective actions taken. <br />PROBLEMS/POSSIBLE VIOLATIONS <br />AND <br />CORRECTIVE ACTIONS <br />Tha nnarntnr chnulrl Dither remnva thaw fncilitiac nr raviaa tha narmit to remove those <br />~Ciliiiac from +ha nermi+nren The ~narnfnrchaVl ^^+pn{iris+P+ha+tl]PSE farilitia~whirh <br />hnva nothing to rln with mining shni ilr+ ha nnrf of the mining raclmm~tinn In nn. nnrf +haea <br />damage waiver agreement from the facility owners. If the landowner is the facility owner <br />and the permittee, the landowner/permittee should clarify that these facilities are not a part <br />of the mining or reclamation plan, are not within the disturbed area boundary, and take <br />steps to preclude mining from the se areas. Proper boundary markers should be posted to <br />distinguish the boundary for these features. <br />2. The facility, having only $2500 bond, appears to be under-bonded. <br />CORRECTION <br />DATE <br />12/ 21/ OS <br />PB or PV: ~?B_ <br />TOPIC(S~: ~d2 <br />SM <br />12/ 21 / OS <br />PB or PV: ~, <br />TOPIC(S~: ~~L <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.