INSPEC02066 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

(Page 4) MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-1992-045 INSPECTION DATE 09/27/04 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS ESC The following problems (PB) and/or possible violations (PV) (and suggested corrective actions) were identified during this inspection. The problems should be corrected by the dates given, or they will become possible violations. The possible violations should be corrected by the dates given to reduce their severity when considered by the Mined Land Reclamation Board. The inspector noted on the previous page should be notified of all corrective actions taken. PROBLEDfS/POSSIBLE VIOLATIONS AND DATE 1. / PROBLEM: The permit boundary markers installed by the operator do not PB or PV:PB reflect the approve permit area of 3 acres in size. TOPIC(S):MP 11/30/04 CORRECTIVE ACTION: Amend the 110(2) permit application to properly reflect the permit area of 3.8 acres. Currently, the markers delineate the permit area to be 3.8 acres rather than the approved 3.0 acres. Such amendment must be received by the Division on or before November 30, 2004. / 2 Y PROBLEM . : The reclamation plan does not address reclamation of the PB or PV:PB maintenance building. TOPIC (S):SF - il/30/04 CORRECTIVE ACTION: Address the reclamation of the maintenance building in the amendment application so that the Division can calculate a cost to remove the structure. If the building is to remain as a component of the postmining land use, then approval must be documented by the local land use authority by November 30, 2004. / 3.V PROBLEM: The mining and reclamation plan does not address the waste pile PB or PV:PB created by the operator. TOPIC (S):P-a 11/30/04 CORRECTIVE ACTION: Address the creation and reclamation of the waste pile noted on site. If the pile is to remain in place, the operator will need to address reclamation of the cut slope in the channel to ultimately achieve a 3h:ly slope. If this issue is not addressed by the operator, then the Division will revise the reclamation cost estimate to move the pile back to the cut slopes to achieve a 3h:ly slope as so noted in the reclamation plan. This should be submitted with item #1 noted above. 4./ PROBLEM: The operator is utilizing water in the creek for the mining PB or PV:PS operation, but has not submitted the appropriate documentation TOPIC(S):FiB to the Division. 11/30/04 CORRECTIVE ACTION: Demonstrate that the operator is in compliance with the permit and applicable Colorado Water Laws regarding the use and exposure of water in the Cashe Creek by November 30, 2004.