Laserfiche WebLink
~i <br />MINE ID f OR PROSPECTING ID f <br />INSPECTION DATE 7-18-94 <br />(Page 2) • <br />M-B1-088 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS ACS <br />This was a pre-operational inspection conducted ae part of the review process for a permit <br />amendment submitted by Western Nobile, the permittee. The only issue of significance <br />identified by the Division's review ie the bond amount that will be required. The existing <br />bond held for the site ie 515,500.00. The amendment incorporates an additional 17.7 <br />disturbed acres into the permit, and changes the mining and reclamation plane from a two <br />phase operation to a 73.7 acre single phase. <br />The permit area consists of a cinder cone with a rail spur around the lower perimeter. Areas <br />around the lower perimeter have been leveled. Stockpiles, processing facilities, scales, <br />office trailers, and parking areas are located on this leveled area at approximate elevation <br />of 7680 feet. Above the leveled area, the excavated cinder cone rises between 120 and 140, <br />feet at elopes of between 2:1 and vertical, to a fairly level top surface. The proposed <br />reclamation plan ie based on the assumption that the deposit ie mined out leaving a level <br />surface at approximately 7680 feet of elevation, however, the bond moat be based upon the <br />highest coat, or worst case, scenario for timing of permit revocation and bond forfeiture. <br />This worst case would occur at the present time, with reclamation coats decreasing ae the <br />cinder cone ie lowered by mining. Reclamation from the extant topographic configuration <br />would involve reducing the steep elopes on the flanks of the cone. Slope reduction to no <br />steeper than 3:1 would allow a good chance for revegetation of the elopes. <br />The overburden soils on the cinder cone can easily be identified by a distinct light brown <br />color, ae contrasted with the black, red, or reddish brown un-weathered cinders or scoria. <br />The overburden soils are stockpiled at three main locations at the site. There ie a supply <br />of soil on top of the cone that consists of approximately 25 to 30 thousand cubic yards. <br />This soil is clearly visible on the aerial photo submitted with the 1992 annual report for <br />the pit. There is also soil piled against the southeast flank of the cone. This pile <br />contains approximately 1700 cubic yards. There is a large soil pile at the south end of the <br />site, containing approximately 22,000 cubic yards. There ie an undisturbed area of <br />approximately 3 acres on the north flank of the cone. When this area is stripped in advance <br />of mining, approximately 4700 cubic yards of soil will be salvaged and stockpiled at the base <br />of the north elope. Given these volumes of soil, approximately 6 inches could be placed over <br />the entire disturbed area at the time of reclamation. It ie important to note that these <br />soil volumes are estimates, and should not be construed ae performance standards to be met <br />by the permittee. The performance standard for this historically disturbed Bite ie for the <br />permittee to protect the existing soil piles, and to salvage any soil encountered in future <br />mining, and to replace all salvaged soil at the time of reclamation. If there ie sufficient <br />soil for a 6 inch cover, it should be spread evenly over the entire disturbance. If there <br />ie a soil deficit, critical areas, each as elopes, should be the focus for soil replacement. <br />An over size scoria dump located at the northeast end of the cone is being included into the <br />permit area by this amendment. The over size material has been pushed or dumped off the edge <br />of the 7680 foot level into a steep aided gulch which contains an ephemeral drainage. The <br />Bite manager, Jim Bretton, indicated that this dump is no longer used. If the dump is to be <br />used in the future, a properly sized culvert would have to be installed, or other <br />accommodation made, such that the drainage way is not further impeded by the toe of the dump. <br />Installation of a culvert or other drainage structure would have to be incorporated into the <br />Reclamation Permit ae a technical revision. The over size dump ie at the angle of repose, <br />and presents a challenge in terms of reclamation. It should be graded to a elope no steeper <br />than 2:1, if possible, and should be covered by soil, perhaps by dumping the soil off the <br />7680 foot level, and revegetated. <br />Attached to the permittee'e copy of this report are copies of correspondence regarding the <br />amendment application received from the Office of the State Engineer, the Colorado Historical <br />Society, and Routt County. Also attached ie the Division's reclamation coat evaluation for <br />this site. In terms of the issues for approval of the amendment application, the Division <br />can approve the application with the following stipulations: <br />A bond in the amount of 238,000.00 be posted for the operation by S <br />19, 1994 and prior to mining or mining related activities in the <br />area defined in the original permit maps. <br />