My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC01657
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC01657
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:56:50 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:01:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980006
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
10/7/2005
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. Comments/Compliance <br />This was a partial inspection conducted by Jim Burnell of CDMG on Friday, October 7, <br />2005. Weather was clear and dry; there was a lot of mud from recent heavy rain. The <br />mine site was quiet. <br />The Pit 1 area west of the entrance road showed good revegetation in general- tall <br />wheatgrass (mostly western, some crested), basin wild rye, squirreltail, with abundant <br />sagebrush and scattered Canada thistle. In places the vegetation was patchy, with less <br />cover than most of the area. There are numerous rows of old snow fence at the top of the <br />hill on the west end. On the west side of Pit 1 -accessed from the county road -there is <br />good vegetation also, but a great deal of Canada thistle, especially in the bottom of the <br />drainage. <br />In the area of pit 1 upstream from pond D there were some contour furrows along the south- <br />facing slope to prevent erosion. Wheatgrass, both western and crested, dominated the <br />slopes, with a much greater proportion of sagebrush on the flats. The channel itself was a <br />grass-lined swale. <br />The road to the minesite was in good condition. There were effective rock check structures in <br />the deeply-incised road ditch. Signs were present but need to update the location of the <br />mine records to the new office. <br />Ditch PD4 in the pit 1 area (reclaimed 1996) is a shallow channel, poorly-defined over much <br />of its length, with some short gravelly stretches. Nowhere along its length is the ditch deeply <br />incised, so it displays no active down-cutting. <br />The twin culverts where PD4 crosses the access road were clear. <br />Ditch PD-3, also in pit 1, is avaguely-defined grass-lined channel over most of its length. <br />Near the bottom end there is some 3-4 inches of downcutting, but nothing of concern. There <br />is a large area with sparse vegetation along the channelway. <br />Pond G was dry; the embankments were stable. Pond F was dry and the embankments <br />were stable. Pond E contained some water; the embankments were stable. Pond D also <br />contained some water; the embankments were stable. <br />The facilities area was stable. This is a large gravel pad with clumps of wheatgrass and <br />basin wild rye. <br />The topsoil piles for ponds F and G were stable and well-vegetated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.