Laserfiche WebLink
i ~ <br />#4) The engineering company, CTL Thompson, raised stability concerns <br />prior to the permit renewal, but nowhere in the permit could there be <br />found where the concerns were addressed. For example, in a CTL <br />Thompson report, the fill stability safety factor was determined to be <br />below program requirements using worst-case-design assumptions; yet, <br />the permit was renewed without addressing the concerns. Also, CTL <br />Thompson found a fill compaction sample to be below acceptable limits, <br />but there is no in icatio$$ a MG pursued the issue. Why hasn#t the <br />CTL Thompson recommendati~bns been addressed? G~{Vp„1•+ <br />~f L~,Q ~,c,,..p ~ ? V ~ ~2 I~ 6~-oT Gam-- X55 u e , <br />CZ ~/~ 6~f rs (j4 S~Lb ~l l~ ~^~LQ.YhS ~tJ Q ' ~~(~l G~' I/~ ~ 1 r"e /G,~ <br />SS~r~ ~~-e. ~sves. / <br />~1 ~?~A~(e~•- o,- ,~te~l/2pQ pvO ~~I Std ~~ cti-~- <br />~~----" ~ vw ~ a I^BvrCw o ~ -~2 .P~H f rl-e re~arG~ o '~ <br />w~s~ ~~~ ~ ~;-~r~-~. <br />}} _ A ~} - I C' -9~ -oho <br />~(~~b,~ a~ -~~e ~~'^~' I/~5~~-t:Pr--~~?14~ (~3oa~so ~ ~ro.,.e~~c~QSP~-1~? <br />~~~,~ l9 <br />p,~~~. D-z, fl3 , <br />p z /U, 3S ~ wl~b, <br />~~,~ „ „ <br /> <br />~. o' w/~6 <br />i~.q~ c~s ~ewk /aa- yr <br />TGr w: ~ <br />~~~ w <br />~~ <br />