Laserfiche WebLink
• (Page 21 • <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-80-049 <br />INSPECTION DATE 05/07/97 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS RCO <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This inspection by the Division was performed as part of its monitoring of 110 permits. This inspector attempted to contact the <br />operator, and left a message with another person at the operator's phone number. No return call was received by this office, nor <br />was the operator present at the inspection. <br />The permit boundary is irregularly shaped, but seems to follow the fencelines and topography of [he site. The file contains a <br />surveyed boundary map provided in the original application materials, but there is nothing depicted along some of the boundaries <br />or within the 8-acre permit area for features, structures or activities. Though lack of a current map is not noted as a problem in this <br />report, the operator should submit a good map showing enough detail to be useable, by the next anniversary date. It may <br />accompany the annual report. <br />The 04/21 /94 inspection report notes that the lack of a permit ID sign and boundary markers is a problem. The operator was to <br />correct the problem, and notify the Division by a specific date. There is no evidence of such notification in the file, and at the time <br />of this inspection no ID sign was noted either. As mentioned above, certain fencelines or corners may actually be on the boundary, <br />but the map does not contain enough information to determine whether this is the case or if boundary markers were actually needed. <br />The topic of "signs and markers" is therefore again noted as a problem on page one and the corrective action explained on the last <br />Page• <br />There are several activities currently being carried out within the permit area by the operator/landowner. Observations during the <br />inspection included livestock feeding and grazing (cattle and horses), miscellaneous equipment storage, timber cutting <br />equipment/firewood processing and storage, and gravel mining. The area of the mining-related activity is small (less than 3 acres) <br />and limited to the southeast end of the permit area. <br />The pit itself is small and shows little evidence of recent or significant usage. Most of the sidewalls are stably graded. There is a <br />highwall on the north side oT the pit, about 1 00 feet long and 1 2 feet high at most. Some material has been placed against the toe <br />of the highwall, perhaps as backfill material (?I. The east and south walls of the pit are partly reclaimed. Sufficient topsoil is <br />stockpiled above the north and east sides of the pit. It is vegetated with annual weeds, but otherwise appears stable and not <br />eroding. <br />The west edge of the permit area appears, according to the map, to be between the toe of the natural slope and Alkali Creek. Some <br />cobble and small boulder material has rolled down the slope from the top where mining has disturbed it, but it seems to be contained <br />within the permit boundaries. Along the top of this natural slope, and at the SW edge of the pit, are two old piles of crushed gravel. <br />The file indicates that this was crushed by the county in the 1 980s. The piles show some sign of recent but limited use. The total <br />volume is estimated to be about 3,000 cubic yards. <br />The file also indicates that the operator sells very little, if any, gravel commmercially. Gravel pits must have a permit if the material <br />is sold or it leaves the actual property. The law specifically states that a permit is not needed if the excavation and use is for the <br />that piece of property. If the operator is not going to sell gravel, and it is not to leave his ranch, then the operator might want to <br />consider reclaiming the permit-related disturbance and requesting release from the permit. The stockpiles may remain for future use <br />on the land. If this option is not considered viable, the operator will of course still be liable for maintaining the site, posting the bond, <br />payment of annual tees and filing of annual reports. (Please contact this office if you wish to discuss this.) <br />The current bond amount is S2500. Based on the amount of current disturbance, this is estimated to be adequate, but detailed <br />reclamation costs will be calculated, and the figures sent to the operator for review. <br />Other than the sign and markers, there were no problems noted during this inspection. If there are questions about this report, <br />please contact this inspector at the address or phone shown below: <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />484 Turner Dr., Bldg F-101 <br />Durango CO 81301 <br />970/247-51 93. <br />cont <br />