My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC00449
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC00449
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:55:57 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 7:55:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004078
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
7/10/2006
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
James k. Kreutz & Associates P.C.
To
DMG
Inspection Date
5/9/2006
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF <br />(INNNCTION)' <br />Chavers incorporates paragraphs 1 through 6 in its First Claim for Relief. <br />8. Immediate and irreparable injury will occur for which there in no adequate remedy <br />of law should injunctive relief not be granted. <br />9. The injuries to Chavers, to Chavers horse operation and Chavers land, the extent <br />of which can not be determined and thus unless TKO is enjoined from such wrongful discharge of <br />water from their property onto Chavers property, Chavers will be irreparably injured. <br />10. Such trespass constitutes a nuisance, inconvenience, and a disruption to the horse <br />operation and further constitutes a physical trespass for which there is no adequate remedy at law. <br />CDOT has caused over twenty (20) dump truck loads of silt to be dug from the culvert area <br />demonstrating the potential future damage to Chavers land should such injunctive relief not be <br />granted. <br />11. It is further submitted there is a strong likelihood Chavers will prevail on the <br />Complaint, that the balance of equities favor such injunction, that the granting of such injunction <br />will not be contrary to public policy, and that the granting of such injunction shall maintain the <br />status quo pending a trial on the merits. <br />SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF <br />(DECLATORY JUDGEMENT) <br />12. Chavers incorporates paragraphs 1 through 11 in its First Claim for Relief and in <br />this Second Claim for Relief. <br />13. Pursuant to C.RC.P. 57 and §13-51-101 et. seq. Chavers moves for <br />Declaratory Judgement determining that TKO has no ditch rights, or any other rights so as to <br />allow discharge of water from TKO's land onto, over or through the Chavers land. <br />14. The alleged ditch rights of TKO are virtually none~stent, such seepage rights <br />having been abandoned, such rights having been previously granted to the owner of the property <br />for a seepage ditch, which is contrary to the purposed of TKO in wanting to develop a water flow <br />to accommodate their commercial gravel operation from their property through CDOT's property <br />across Chavers property all contrary to the prior seepage rights asserted by TKO. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.