My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC00302
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC00302
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:55:49 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 7:54:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981047
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
4/17/2007
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made during the <br />inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection and the facts or <br />evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />This was a complete inspection conducted by Joe Dudash of the Colorado DRMS. No one represented the <br />operator during the field inspection and records check. <br />Roads <br />The road up Hubbard Creek Canyon was in very good condition. The road had been graded only a few days or <br />so before the inspection. The access road that goes across Hubbard Creek to the mine site also was in very good <br />condition. The two Hubbard Creek culverts were functioning properly. <br />The mine site entrance gate was locked. There was a large four foot diameter rock in the middle of the access <br />road that leads to pond 5. There is still enough room for a pickup truck to go around it. The rock, obviously, <br />should be removed. <br />Siens and Markers <br />The mine ID sign was up on the front gate. The sign contained the required information. The records location <br />sign was also on the front gate. Surface disturbance markers were up. <br />Reclamation <br />The backfilled and graded mine site showed no signs of slope instability. The vegetative cover was good and no <br />erosional gullies were observed. No stability problems were noted at the reclaimed upper haul road either. The <br />benches and backfilled highwall were stable as well. The only underdrain that was flowing any water was the <br />north underdrain, which had a small trickle of water coming out of it. <br />The reclaimed coal stockpile area had a moderate to good vegetative cover. There were no erosional or stability <br />problems at the stockpile site. <br />Hydrology <br />Pond 4 was dry. The pond embankment was well vegetated and stable. Pond spillways were functional. The <br />road culvert that leads from the reclaimed coal stockpile area to pond 4 was clear. The upland diversion ditch <br />above the reclaimed coal stockpile area was well vegetated and had sufficient capacity. <br />There was a small volume of standing water in pond 5. The primary and emergency spillways of pond 5 were <br />operational. The gated primary discharge valve was closed. The main collection ditch leading south into pond 5 <br />had sufficient capacity. The black culvert that brings upper bench runoff into the pond 5 collection ditch was in <br />place. <br />Records <br />The mine records are located in the Delta County Courthouse. The records were in compliance, as documented <br />in the attached records checklist. <br />c:/word/b I ueri bbon/in sp0407 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.