Laserfiche WebLink
BACULITE MESA, LLC <br /> 5040 Acoma St, Denver, CO 80216 1719-661-88301 <br /> January 26, 2026 <br /> Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br /> Ms . Jocelyn Carter <br /> 1313 Sherman St, Suite 215 <br /> Denver, CO 80203 <br /> Dear Ms . Carter; <br /> RE: Technical Revision 02 <br /> Baculite Mesa Pit - M-1997-011 <br /> This Technical Revision is prepared to address the 5 problems <br /> noted in the Division' s inspection report dated 7/29/2025 . Each <br /> will be addressed in the order presented as problems in the <br /> inspection report . The Mining Plan, Reclamation Plan and Water <br /> Exhibits have been revised to reflect the changes made in this <br /> Technical Revision packet . In addition, it corrects a permit <br /> boundary problem found when reviewing the current legal <br /> description as discussed in the following text . <br /> The request for updated Mining and Reclamation Maps is not <br /> necessary because neither plans have been revised. A survey of <br /> the property to better define and mark the boundary corners has <br /> been completed and a corrected and updated Map Exhibit C - Pre <br /> Mining Map and a Bond analysis map are provided to support this <br /> Technical Revision. <br /> Permit Area -vs- Permit Line <br /> During reconstruction of the maps the Surveyor found a number of <br /> problems that affected replicating the original boundary lines . <br /> We had to make some assumptions and the primary one was that many <br /> of the legs of the boundary approximately matched lot lines found <br /> on the original subdivision maps . We chose to use the lot lines <br /> as the basis for reconstructing the permit boundary for this <br /> reason. While many of the original permit lines were close <br /> matches to the lot line there were minor curves and short legs <br /> that the original map makers chose to just straighten and create <br /> a new line description for those combined legs . <br /> In doing the new outline the surveyor found that the corrected <br /> permit outline, while closely matching the original in shape, <br /> actually enclosed approximately 2100 . 14 acres, not the 1970 . 0 <br />