My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2025-11-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1986123
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1986123
>
2025-11-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1986123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2025 9:26:08 AM
Creation date
11/24/2025 9:19:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1986123
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/24/2025
Doc Name Note
Petition For Reconsideration
Doc Name
Correspondence
From
Witwer, Oldenburg Barry & Groom, LLP
To
DRMS
Email Name
JR2
AME
CMM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Soil <br /> Non-Mined <br /> In the non-mined areas two test holes were excavated to the depth of shovel refusal. Based on visual <br /> observation the soil depth ranged from 8 to 12 inches.The soil had many fine and very fine roots. The <br /> color was dark(10 YR 4/3 estimated) indicating sufficient organic matter content,additionally the soil <br /> structure and consistence was as expected from a natural grassland in a grassland flood plain landform <br /> (Photograph 3). In general,this area appeared to be a good representative of the non-mined soil <br /> conditions with minimal anthropogenic factors affecting the soil development. <br /> Mined <br /> The portion of the mind area of the O'Brien pit had silty loam/sandy loam/loamy sand soils to a depth <br /> between 4 and 6inches,where observed in the two test holes excavated in this area.The soil horizons <br /> were layered with discernable textural and color differences between layered horizons.The soil would <br /> be classified as an entisol with little if any pedogenesis having previously occurred. Based on the visual <br /> evidence there appeared to be approximately 2 inches of sandy loam soil below the layered soils but <br /> above the cobbles and gravels. In addition to the soils not being capable of supporting self-sustaining <br /> vegetation the soils in the mined areas were very compacted and do not appear to be properly prepared, <br /> in my professional opinion. Review of the soils indicates that approximately 2 inches of topsoil may have <br /> been placed and the remaining 2 to 4 inches of soil was likely deposited by flooding of the Big Thompson <br /> River. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.