Laserfiche WebLink
Permit Number: C1982057 Page 8 of 20 <br />Phase III <br /> <br /> <br />Rule 3.03.1(4) states: <br />"No bond shall be fully released until all reclamation requirements of these Rules and the Act are fully <br />met...". The same rule further states, "No acreage shall be released from the permit area until all surface <br />coal mining and reclamation operations on that acreage have been completed in accordance with the <br />approved reclamation plan." <br /> <br />Permit Requirements: Success Standards <br />The Seneca IIW Mine reclamation plan calls for a minimum of four feet of suitable plant growth medium, <br />including an average of 1.3 feet of topsoil to be placed on graded lands prior to revegetation (Permit Tab <br />21). Topsoil depth replacement information was included in the SL5 Phase II bond release application that <br />was approved in 2014. The approved revegetation plan is discussed in Tab 22 of the Seneca IIW Mine’s <br />permit application package. Tab 22 describes the goals of reclamation, provides a revegetation plan and a <br />description of how revegetation success will be demonstrated. The post mining land use approved for the <br />site is livestock grazing and wildlife habitat with a greater emphasis placed on livestock grazing. <br /> <br />Drainage control at the site comprises armored reconstructed drainages, sedimentation ponds and stock tanks <br />as well as various secondary containment measures including check dams, diversion ditches, sediment <br />sumps, contour ditches, riprap, and vegetative sediment filters among other methods. Sedimentation ponds <br />have all been designed to meet State and Federal regulations and to provide storage and treatment for runoff <br />resulting from 10-year 24-hour precipitation events. <br /> <br />Protection of the hydrologic balance at the site comprises ground water and surface water monitoring for water <br />quantity and water quality. The natural ground waters at the Seneca IIW mine comprise high concentrations of <br />dissolved minerals and solids. It is expected that spoil utilized in reclamation will affect ground water quality as <br />TDS (total dissolved solids), trends to increase over baseline levels. Seven sediment ponds are utilized for <br />controlling surface runoff from disturbed areas. Six of the ponds are NPDES surface monitoring sites. <br />Monitoring occurs in Sage and Dry Creeks as well as Hubberson Gulch. Surface water monitoring installations <br />will remain. Water rights have been protected, and a water augmentation plan was put in place for the over <br />appropriated Yampa River. <br /> <br />Alluvial Valley Floors (AVF) <br />A 1990 AFV study evaluated the Dry, Grassy and Sage Creek drainages around the Seneca IIW permit area <br />with respect to their potential as AVF’s. As intermittent streams, Dry and Sage Creeks have insufficient <br />carrying capacity to remove sediment built up from fans emanating from tributaries and sediment from <br />valley slopes. The lower reaches comprise alluvium with limited water availability although there exist areas <br />of flood irrigation. AVFs do exist adjacent to and downstream of the Seneca property. There is hydraulic <br />communication with two sub-irrigated fields in the Dry Creek drainage as well as flood irrigated fields in the <br />Sage Creek drainage, however these parcels do not meet the AVF criterion as per the 2005 assessment by <br />ESCO Associates (Dr. David L. Buckner) due to the distance the flood irrigated fields are located in relation <br />to the permit boundary. TDS evaluations indicate lower values than those predicted in the permit document. <br />The quality of surface water would not be impacted and that irrigation and stock water, the permitted uses, <br />would not experience material damage. This conclusion is supported by the water quality data from the past