My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2025-08-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981019
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2025-08-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2025 8:07:34 AM
Creation date
8/13/2025 8:06:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/1/2025
Section_Exhibit Name
Rule 2 Permits -ST
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br /> <br />South Taylor – Rule 2, Page 34 Revision Date: 7/21/25 <br /> Revision No.: MR-267 <br />where: nmin = the minimum number of observations needed <br />t = the distribution value at a given confidence level (CL); i.e. 1.64 (90% CL) for <br />grassland communities and 1.282 (80% CL) for shrubland communities <br /> s2 = the sample variance <br /> d2 = 10% level of accuracy, or 0.1 <br /> x = the sample mean <br />An adequate sample for each parameter (cover and production) was determined in each vegetation type <br />by exceeding the nmin requirement obtained from the equation with a minimum of 15 samples. <br />Data Analyses - Cover data were summarized by determining the mean percent cover, relative percent <br />cover, and standard deviation for each species, lifeform group, rock, litter, and bare ground within each <br />vegetation type sampled. Above ground standing biomass of species (production) was determined as the <br />mean dry weight of all species in all plots within each vegetation type sampled. Production was <br />expressed in grams per square meter and pounds per acre for each type. Shrub density was computed as <br />the mean number of plants per 50 square meters and the mean number of plants per 0.1 acre for all <br />species. Tree density was computed as the mean number of plants per 100 square meters and the mean <br />number of plants per 0.1 acre for all species. Species diversity was computed as the mean number of <br />different species encountered by vegetation hits along the 50-meter cover transect. <br />Statistical Equivalency of Reference Areas - The statistical equivalency of each reference area with the <br />study area was determined for vegetation cover, production and species density in each vegetation type <br />according to the following equation (OSM 1980): <br />(x 1 −x 2 )<or >t (s 21 /n1 )+(s2 2 /n 2 ) <br />Where: x = sample mean <br />s2 = sample variance <br />t = t table value for 90% confidence level <br />n = sample size <br />Livestock Carrying Capacity - Livestock carrying capacity of each vegetation type was determined by <br />considering the nutritional requirements of cattle and sheep (Stoddart et al, 1975) according to the <br />following assumptions. A cow and calf (cattle animal unit) consumes 900 pounds of air-dry forage per <br />month and a ewe and lamb (sheep animal unit) consumes 150 pounds of air-dry forage per month. The <br />conversion of oven dry weight to air-dry weight is 1.11. The ideal utilization factor for forage grazing is <br />50 percent. The livestock carrying capacity was determined by the following: <br />LCC = (1.11 x FA x .5) / FC <br />where: LCC = Livestock Carrying Capacity (AUM per acre) <br /> FA = Forage Available (oven-dry lbs/acre) <br /> FC = Forage Consumption Requirement (900 lbs for cattle AUM, 150 lbs for sheep <br />AUM) <br />Results - The vegetation of the Danforth study area is typical of northwestern Colorado. Hillsides are <br />covered with a mixture of mountain shrub and aspen forests at upper elevations while sagebrush <br />dominates the lower elevations. Valley bottoms are dominated by a mixture of grassy meadows and <br />sagebrush. The valley bottoms are used more intensively for grazing than upland areas. Hay is produced
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.