Laserfiche WebLink
RULE 2 PERMITS <br /> <br />South Taylor – Rule 2, Page 30 Revision Date: 7/21/25 <br /> Revision No.: MR-267 <br />of the soil map units identified in the South Taylor mining area by Consol are presented in Exhibit 9, Item <br />6. <br /> <br />The South Taylor mining area contains deep soils in mostly gently to moderately sloping locations. <br />These soils generally have favorable textures for reclamation. Soils on steep slopes tend to be shallow <br />and excessively channery or cobbly. <br /> <br />The physicochemical soil data were compared with the topsoil and substitute topsoil suitability criteria <br />shown on Table 2.04.9-5. A summary of the limitations of each soil profile by horizon and the estimated <br />average salvage depth for each soil map unit is shown on Table 2.04.9-6. Topsoil salvage and handling <br />for the South Taylor mining area are shown on Map 28. <br /> <br />There appears to be few chemical limitations for salvage and use of soils for reclamation with the <br />exception of clay content. The pH for the samples collected by Consol ranged from 6.5 to 8.6 with the <br />suitability range of 5.5 to 8.5. Only two samples exceeded this suitability criterion. The highest specific <br />conductivity reading was 1.3 mmhos/cm which is well below the level of concern (4.00). The highest <br />SAR (sodium adsorption ratio) measured was 2.8 (values less than 11 are generally suitable). Soluble <br />selenium levels were all below the detection level of 0.05 ppm, well below the 0.1 ppm level of concern. <br />All samples had boron levels of 2.51 ppm or less. Levels of 5.00 ppm or greater are considered <br />unsuitable. The saturation percent of all soils analyzed were within the acceptable range of 25% to 85%. <br />Only two samples had a sand content of less than 15% and only one sample had clay content greater than <br />40%. <br /> <br />The main limitation for soil suitability was the percentage of coarse fragments. The coarse fragments for <br />each soil profile were obtained from the soil description tables in the CCC soil inventory report (CCC <br />1984). Soils were considered suitable to the depth where coarse fragments were no greater than 35%. <br />Some soils were found to be suitable throughout the horizon (Silas, Lamphier, Burnette, Inchau, Rhone) <br />and most were suitable on surface horizon. Only Waybe was found have excessive coarse fragments at <br />the surface (60% coarse fragments from 0-3 inches). <br /> <br />Each soil horizon was determined to be suitable or unsuitable. The weighted average depth of suitable <br />soil was then calculated for each map unit based on the suitable depth of each soil series multiplied by the <br />percentage of the map unit which it comprises. The weighted average depth of salvageable soil <br />calculations are summarized in Table 2.04.9-6A. <br /> <br />Following the development in any one five-year mine area the amount of soil salvage will be assessed to <br />determine the need for assessing potential substitute soil sources. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />2.04.10 Vegetation Information <br /> <br />The objective of this section is to meet the requirements of Rule 2.04.10 et seq. by describing the general <br />vegetation community types and distribution within the permit boundary revision area and providing <br />vegetation data in sufficient detail to facilitate development of a revegetation plan and performance <br />standards for the disturbed area associated with the South Taylor mining areas. <br /> <br />General Vegetation Information – South Taylor Pit Area <br /> <br />General vegetation mapping information was developed based on the following information: <br />