My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2025-07-03_REVISION - M1979103
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1979103
>
2025-07-03_REVISION - M1979103
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2025 10:41:58 AM
Creation date
7/7/2025 10:33:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1979103
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/3/2025
Doc Name
Request For Succession Of Operator
From
Oldcastle SW Group, Inc dba United Companies
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SO6
Email Name
ACY
THM
SMS
EL1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 6.5: GEOTECHNICAL STABILITY EXHIBIT <br /> There are no known geologic hazards on the proposed site. Based on a slope stability analysis, <br /> buildings or other structures within 200' of the Amick Pit affected area will not be affected by <br /> mining excavation. The mine plan specifies a minimum buffer of 50-ft to the closest structure of <br /> property fences. A standard slope was analyzed for stability. <br /> The material properties are derived from Table 2.5 in the SME Mining Reference Handbook', as <br /> there is no site-specific strength data of the material available. Therefore, all materials are <br /> matched to a classification from this table that best matches the materials in terms of <br /> description. The native alluvial material is best classified as sand and gravel with a mixed grain <br /> size. A layer of soil and sand lies atop the sand and gravel deposit. This material is best <br /> described as loose sand, mixed grain size. A summary of the material properties can be seen in <br /> Table GS-1. <br /> Table GS-1. Material Properties <br /> Material Unit Weight(lbs/ft) Cohesion Friction Angle <br /> Sand and gravel,mixed grain 110 0 45 <br /> size <br /> Loose sand,mixed grain size 99 0 34 <br /> The final reclamation (3H:1V) slope was analyzed. The final reclaimed slope crest will be the <br /> closest excavation comes to any structures. <br /> 1 . Reclamation Slopes <br /> Factor of Safety (FOS) is expressed in terms of strength divided by stress as a ratio. It is arrived <br /> at by an iterative computer process where a slope failure is assumed, the strength and stress of <br /> that slope failure are calculated, and those values are compared to determine a lowest factor of <br /> safety. In the case of the Amick Pit slope stability analysis, the Bishop's Method of Slices was <br /> the iterative calculation used, and the software GALENA was used to model slopes and <br /> calculate the factor of safety. One standard slope (see Figure GS-1) was analyzed to look at the <br /> factor of safety. Table GS-2 lists the analysis conducted and their respective factors of safety. <br /> GALENA data tables and analysis result figures are attached as Appendix GS-1. <br /> 1 Original source: Hoek and Bray 1977 <br /> Amick Pit GS-1 Lewicki& Associates <br /> January 2025 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.