My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2025-06-30_PERMIT FILE - C1981019 (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2025-06-30_PERMIT FILE - C1981019 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2025 2:22:40 PM
Creation date
7/1/2025 9:58:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/30/2025
Section_Exhibit Name
Rule 2 Permits -ST
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br /> •r».., .:71w:x ., >.. ,, .. ;�„rs. ,,.,.K., ... r: r;..+w:.. ,-, a«.:tr•a... „ vt' r. .pt-at.�;-,p�;.ux raa,�^ <br /> identified and were considered unsuitable as a plant growth medium for reclamation. The salvage depth <br /> for each series was from the surface to the top of the first unsuitable horizon. <br /> Fourteen map units were identified within the disturbed area associated with the South Taylor mining <br /> area. A summary of the limitations and estimated depth of suitable soil is provided in Table 2.04.9-6, <br /> Summary of Soil Limitations and Salvage Depths— South Taylor Mine Area. Soil physicochemical data <br /> from the 18 CCC soil profiles are provided in Table 2.04.9-8 for a total of 60 soil samples. Descriptions <br /> of the soil map units identified in the South Taylor mining area by Consol are presented in Exhibit 9, Item <br /> 6. <br /> The South Taylor mining area contains deep soils in mostly gently to moderately sloping locations. <br /> These soils generally have favorable textures for reclamation. Soils on steep slopes tend to be shallow <br /> and excessively channery or cobbly. <br /> The physicochemical soil data were compared with the topsoil and substitute topsoil suitability criteria <br /> shown on Table 2.04.9-5. A summary of the limitations of each soil profile by horizon and the estimated <br /> average salvage depth for each soil map unit is shown on Table 2.04.9-6. Topsoil salvage and handling <br /> for the South Taylor mining area are shown on Map 28. <br /> There appears to be few chemical limitations for salvage and use of soils for reclamation with the <br /> exception of clay content. The pH for the samples collected by Consol ranged from 6.5 to 8.6 with the <br /> suitability range of 5.5 to 8.5. Only two samples exceeded this suitability criterion. The highest specific <br /> conductivity reading was 1.3 mmhos/cm which is well below the level of concern (4.00). The highest <br /> SAR (sodium adsorption ratio) measured was 2.8 (values less than 11 are generally suitable). Soluble <br /> selenium levels were all below the detection level of 0.05 ppm, well below the 0.1 ppm level of concern. <br /> All samples had boron levels of 2.51 ppm or less. Levels of 5.00 ppm or greater are considered <br /> unsuitable. The saturation percent of all soils analyzed were within the acceptable range of 25%to 85%. <br /> Only two samples had a sand content of less than 15% and only one sample had clay content greater than <br /> 40%. <br /> The main limitation for soil suitability was the percentage of coarse fragments. The coarse fragments for <br /> each soil profile were obtained from the soil description tables in the CCC soil inventory report (CCC <br /> 1984). Soils were considered suitable to the depth where coarse fragments were no greater than 35%. <br /> Some soils were found to be suitable throughout the horizon (Silas, Lamphier, Burnette, Inchau, Rhone) <br /> and most were suitable on surface horizon. Only Waybe was found have excessive coarse fragments at <br /> the surface(60%coarse fragments from 0-3 inches). <br /> Each soil horizon was determined to be suitable or unsuitable. The weighted average depth of suitable <br /> soil was then calculated for each map unit based on the suitable depth of each soil series multiplied by the <br /> percentage of the map unit which it comprises. The weighted average depth of salvageable soil <br /> calculations are summarized in Table 2.04.9-6A. <br /> Following the development in any one five-year mine area the amount of soil salvage will be assessed to <br /> determine the need for assessing potential substitute soil sources. <br /> Order II Soil Survey—Lower Wilson Mining Area <br /> This section presents data assembled, collected, and analyzed specifically for the Lower Wilson mining <br /> area. The mine plan for the Lower Wilson mining area has not been developed. The purpose of this <br /> section is to present and establish baseline data for the area. Prior to conducting any mining activities in <br /> South Taylor/Lower Wilson—Rule 2,Page 32 Revision Date: 12/20/19 <br /> Revision No.: TR-135 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.