My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2025-06-23_REVISION - M1980244 (92)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2025-06-23_REVISION - M1980244 (92)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2025 9:43:37 AM
Creation date
6/24/2025 9:28:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/23/2025
Doc Name Note
Attachment 10
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM14
Email Name
ERR
ZTT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cripple Creek&Victor Gold Mine al <br /> Valley Leach Facility Expansions ■ <br /> Detailed Design for Permitting <br /> NewFields Project No.475.0106.064• <br /> March 2024 <br /> Ore: Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio for the ore does not have a significant impact on the <br /> resulting liner displacements and was conservatively estimated to be 700 ksf, which is the lower <br /> bound value for rockfill (USSD, 2011). Poison's Ratio for the rockfill can range from as high as 0.4 <br /> to as low as 0.1 (Bowles, 1997). This analysis assumes a conservative Poisson's ratio of 0.2 for <br /> end dumped ore. <br /> Pit Backfill and Fill: Reported values indicate that the elastic moduli for rockfill is highly variable <br /> and influenced by a number of factors including parent rock material, particle size distribution, <br /> and effective stress conditions. Previous back analysis of rockfill at the mill platform resulted in <br /> the upper bound value for pit backfill and fill material. The lower bound value was estimated <br /> from lower bound values presented by Janbu (1963) and Fang (1991) for gravel and sand <br /> deposits. <br /> Foundation (Sands and Gravels): Elastic parameters were estimated to be equivalent to that of <br /> the low compactive effort pit backfill and fill material. <br /> Foundation (Bedrock): The bedrock foundation is composed of the competent host rock <br /> commonly found at CC&V, and relatively incompressible for the settlement analysis. A high <br /> elastic modulus consistent with the host rock was selected. <br /> • <br /> 5.2.3. Settlement Evaluation Results <br /> The results of the settlement evaluation indicate that total settlements under the ultimate <br /> loading from 550 feet of stacked ore (represented on Section A) will be on the order of <br /> approximately 16 feet, and maximum strain in the geomembrane (4.5 percent) occur at the <br /> center of the facility as represented in Section A. This amount of settlement is considered <br /> acceptable as the settlement below the facility is expected to be distributed along the entire <br /> length of the facility, maintaining design slopes, solution collection recovery systems, and <br /> geomembrane integrity. Settlements ranging from 5 to 7 feet were estimated for Section D over <br /> the Elkton Pit backfill. Settlement was evaluated with pit backfill placed with low compactive <br /> effort and with the uppermost 35 feet of backfill placed with high compactive effort as <br /> recommended in the VLF2 Phase 3 Design Report (NewFields, 2020). The low compactive effort <br /> pit backfill material results in a maximum strain of 11 percent, while the high compactive effort <br /> pit backfill reduces the maximum strain to 2 percent. LLDPE geomembrane can undergo high <br /> strains in lab settings; however, for conservatism, only strains less than 10 percent have been <br /> deemed acceptable for this analysis. Settlement was deemed acceptable provided that it did not <br /> negatively influence solution drainage or leak detection systems. <br /> The PSSA will be constructed during Stage A, at the start of the expansion project. The PSSA <br /> facility was evaluated for settlement to determine the potential influence the surrounding <br /> • <br /> Page 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.