Laserfiche WebLink
11 <br />The post-mining backfill configuration for the L Pit would decrease the depth of spoil placed at the head <br />of the slope and increase the depth of spoil placed at the toe of the slope to act as a buttress to any <br />movement. Shallower overall surface topography also would increase the stability of the backfilled spoil. <br />The stability analysis showed that the post-mining stability for the AOC variance has improved Safety <br />Factors when compared to restoring the L Pit to AOC. <br />In addition, post-mining drainages have been designed to mimic pre-mining drainages as part of the <br />AOC variance drainage design and would result in overall watershed improvements. For the L Pit, the <br />overall drainage area for Flume Gulch, which is the major drainage associated with the L Pit, would <br />increase by approximately 181.2 acres or 9.7%. The pre- and post-mining drainage densities would <br />remain the same and the overall drainage gradient would increase by 0.2%. Sediment yield would <br />decrease from 1.13 tons/acre to 0.81 tons/acre under the proposed post-mining configuration. <br />Table 7 summarizes the pre- and post-mining characteristics for the L Pit. <br />Table 7 Pre- and Post-Mining Characteristics for the L Pit <br />Condition Acreage <br />Slopes <br />(°) <br />Safety <br />Factors <br />Drainage <br />Density <br />(mi/mi2) <br />Gradient <br />(%) <br />Sediment <br />Yield Per Acre <br />(tons) <br />Pre-Mining 1,877.5 4-26 1.3 to 1.5 3.8 10.6 1.13 <br />Post-Mining 2,114.3 4-14 1.58 to 2.14 3.6 10.3 0.74 <br /> <br />The Ash Pit shows overall pre-mining topography with shallower slopes but does include the steeper <br />slopes of over 23° in the northern portion of the pit. Post-mining the slopes would range from 4 to 14° <br />and would blend with the surrounding topography. <br />The post-mining stability analysis for the Ash Pit showed that the AOC variance would significantly <br />improve Safety Factors when compared to restoring the Ash Pit to AOC. <br />In addition, post-mining drainages would result in overall watershed improvements. For the Ash Pit, the <br />drainage area for Johnson Gulch, which is the major drainage associated with the Ash Pit, would <br />increase by approximately 3 acres. The pre- and post-mining drainage densities would change slightly, <br />and the overall drainage gradient would decrease 1.5%. Sediment yield would decrease from 1.03 <br />tons/acre to 0.56 tons/acre under the proposed post-mining configuration. <br />Table 8 summarizes the pre- and post-mining characteristics for the Ash Pit. <br />Table 8 Pre- and Post-Mining Characteristics for the Ash Pit <br />Condition Acreage <br />Slopes <br />(°) <br />Safety <br />Factors <br />Drainage <br />Density <br />(mi/mi2) <br />Gradient <br />(%) <br />Sediment <br />Yield Per Acre <br />(tons) <br />Pre-Mining 1,432 4-23 1.36 3.1 9.3 1.03 <br />Post-Mining 1,435 4-14 1.75 3.2 7.8 0.56 <br /> <br />Approval of the post-mining topography AOC variance also would improve the post-mining land use of <br />rangeland by allowing for cattle to graze on shallower slopes. In steeper areas cattle would tend to <br />congregate on shallower slopes and that could result in over-grazing in these areas. The shallower <br />slopes would provide for more dispersed grazing. <br />Finally, the landowners have approved the proposed changes in post-mining topography.