My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2025-05-02_REVISION - C1981010 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2025-05-02_REVISION - C1981010 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2025 11:15:36 AM
Creation date
5/6/2025 10:46:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/2/2025
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Trapper Mining, Inc.
Type & Sequence
PR12
Email Name
RAR
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Trapper was approved for a variance from backfilling and grading to the approximate original <br /> contour in the L Pit and in the Ash Pit with PR9 and modified with PR12. The following <br /> summarizes the findings required by Rule 2.06.5 for the incorporation of a variance from the <br /> approximate original contour restoration requirements for steep slope mining: <br /> 1. TMI is not revising the post-mining land use for rangeland,wildlife habitat and <br /> cropland. The L and Ash pits will be reclaimed to support the approved post mine <br /> land use of rangeland which will support grazing as an agricultural use. <br /> 2. The post-mine land use established by reclamation of the L and Ash pits constitutes <br /> an equal or better economic use. <br /> 3. The applicant is not proposing an alternative post-mining land use whereby this is not <br /> applicable. <br /> 4. TMI has demonstrated the watershed of lands within the proposed permit area and <br /> adjacent areas will be improved by the operation. TMI demonstrated there will be a <br /> reduction in the total suspended solids or other pollutants discharged to the surface <br /> waters from the permit area as compared to such discharges prior to mining in the L <br /> and Ash pits. <br /> 5. TMI provided documentation to the landowners of the affected land associated with <br /> the variance; TMI and the Colorado State Land Board have knowingly requested, in <br /> writing,as part of the (PR9)application,that a variance be granted in A Pit. <br /> 6. The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed operation will be conducted in <br /> accordance with Rule 4.27.4: <br /> a. The L and Ash Pits highwalls will be eliminated and backfilled with spoil and <br /> the post mine configuration will exceed the required 1.3 factor of safety as <br /> required by the rule. <br /> b. The watershed control of the area shall be improved. There will not be a <br /> significant change to the post-mining watershed areas that would impact <br /> seasonal or flood flows. The sediment yield per acre,postmining in the L and <br /> Ash pits shall be less than pre-mining levels. <br /> c. The land above the highwalls in the Ash and L pits will only be disturbed in <br /> compliance with the approved mining and reclamation plan as depicted on <br /> map M10A and M10B and will be necessary for the establishment of the <br /> proposed post-mining topography as shown on Map M12. <br /> d. The proposed plan, if implemented as described in the permit application <br /> package should allow compliance with Rule 2.06.5. <br /> e. Not applicable to this operation. <br /> 7. The proposed operation should allow for other requirements of the Act, Rules and <br /> this regulatory program to be met should TMI conduct the operation as proposed. <br /> XXI. In Situ Processing <br /> No specific approvals are granted to the applicant under this section. <br /> 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.