My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2025-04-11_REVISION - M1988112 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
2025-04-11_REVISION - M1988112 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2025 8:52:02 AM
Creation date
4/14/2025 8:31:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/11/2025
Doc Name Note
Appendix D Thru Attachment E Binder 2 of 2
Doc Name
Request For Amendment To Permit
From
Battle Mountain Resources, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM4
Email Name
LJW
THM
EL1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Revisions to Modeling Hydraulic Controls, West Pit Devon Hornvedt <br /> San Luis Project Newmont USA Limited <br /> • The models were simulated using the US Geological Survey (USGS) code <br /> MODFLOW2005 (Harbaugh, 2005). The original simulations were run using MODLOW <br /> SURFACT which is a proprietary code (HydroGeoLogic Inc., 1996). MODFLOW2005 is <br /> a public-domain software code. This transition allows for easier review and transfer of the <br /> model simulations to regulators and/or independent third-party reviewers, as needed. <br /> • A second layer was added to the base of the model to better represent potential vertical <br /> groundwater movement into and out of the underlying Precambrian bedrock and Santa Fe <br /> Formation from the overlying alluvium and West Pit backfill. The original modeling <br /> simulated the base of the alluvium and backfill as a no flow boundary. <br /> • Simulated hydraulic conductivity of the alluvium in the vicinity of the alluvial window was <br /> adjusted based on analysis of the test data collected during the hydrologic investigation <br /> (EA, 2022). <br /> • The hydraulic conductivity value assigned to the underlying layer that represents the <br /> combined Santa Fe Formation and Precambrian basement hydrologic units was based on <br /> analysis of the hydrologic testing of the Santa Fe Formation. <br /> • Monthly water level data collected from the newly installed alluvial monitor wells were <br /> used to develop additional calibration targets that were included in the model. <br /> • The thickness of the slurry wall was increased from one foot to three feet in the relevant <br /> simulations. <br /> 3.0 MODEL CALIBRATION <br /> As was done in the original modeling, water level measurements and operational flow rates that <br /> characterize two unique sets of conditions were used to calibrate the updated model. One condition <br /> reflects the return of the groundwater flow system to pseudo-steady state non-pumping conditions <br /> following the termination of mine dewatering. No pumping occurred at the West Pit from early <br /> 1997 until mid-1999. The second condition reflects the pumping of the West Pit backfill in order <br /> to reverse the hydraulic gradient between the West Pit and Rito Seco. Continuous pumping of the <br /> West Pit from the backfill wells began in 2000 and has continued to the present. The model is <br /> calibrated to both sets of conditions. <br /> Water level data collected from site monitoring wells in the first quarter of 1999 represent the non- <br /> pumping condition. The average water level elevations measured from site monitoring wells from <br /> 2012 through 2017 are considered representative of the potentiometric surface during pumping <br /> from West Pit backfill well BF-5 at approximately 200 gpm. Pumping was also occurring during <br /> that time from alluvial wells M-32 and M-33, at a combined rate of approximately 15 gpm. The <br /> first quarter 1999 and the 2012-2017 average water level data sets were used as calibration targets <br /> for the two unique sets of conditions(steady state,non-pumping vs.transient,pumping).The water <br /> level data were adjusted to the measure point elevation determined from the NAD83 CSPS survey. <br /> Average water level data from the alluvial wells installed in the 2020 hydrologic testing program <br /> May 2023 4 Engineering Analytics,Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.