My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DRMS Comment Objection Intake - DEV 3/31/2025 (52)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M1977410
>
DRMS Comment Objection Intake - DEV 3/31/2025 (52)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 10:04:16 PM
Creation date
3/31/2025 9:36:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977410
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
3/31/2025
Doc Name
Comment/Objection
From
Lynette Schneller
To
DRMS
Email Name
JPL
JPL
Media Type
D
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Your City <br /> Broomfield <br /> Your State <br /> CO <br /> Your Zip Code <br /> Maximum of 10 digits. (Example)80202 <br /> 80021 <br /> Email Address <br /> Enter a valid email address in this field to receive a confirmation e-mail. <br /> lives4dreams@aol.com <br /> Your Phone Number* (?) <br /> Used only to follow up. <br /> 3039159176 <br /> Extension <br /> Alternate Phone Number(?) <br /> Used only to follow up. <br /> Alternate Phone Extension <br /> Connection to Operation <br /> Select all that apply <br /> Land Owner of affected land Structure Owner within 200' of affected land <br /> Mineral Owner Nearby Resident <br /> Adjacent Land Owner Concerned Citizen <br /> Government Agency Other <br /> DESCRIPTION OF COMMENT OR OBJECTION <br /> You are providing a comment or objection to the public record of a permitting action currently under review by the Division of <br /> Reclamation, Mining and Safety.This form is not intended for reporting of possible violations or illegal activity. Please be as specific <br /> as possible. <br /> Comment/Objection Narrative* <br /> GIR has already struggled with meeting certain environmental requirements.To expand the mine beyond its <br /> current footprint has a high likelihood of expanding the problems in kind.While I oppose this expansion in an <br /> area where tourists and locals alike enjoy recreation in the foothills of the Rockies,it is critical to ensure that the <br /> environmental protection plan addresses the adjoining area as well as points downstream;specifies which <br /> minerals and chemicals will be present in the ponds and at what anticipated concentrations;and explains how <br /> birds,aquatic,and land-based native wildlife will be protected.Additionally,the applicant plans to re-route <br /> surface water flows uphill of the operation around the disturbance area.Again, require the applicant to explain <br /> how Coon Track Creek,its associated wetlands,and the surrounding ecosystem will be impacted by this re- <br /> routing and how they will mitigate the impact.Anything short of a technically sound plan would be clear grounds <br /> for denying the expansion. <br /> Permitting Action Comment/Objection is Regarding <br /> • New Permit Change to Existing Permit <br /> Permit Number*(?) <br /> Enter a valid permit number <br /> M1977410 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.