Laserfiche WebLink
Comment/Objection Narrative* <br /> I am writing as a concerned resident regarding the proposed Cross Mine Application(M1977410)and the <br /> significant risks it poses to our community and environment. I respectfully submit the following comments for <br /> consideration in light of applicable state laws and regulations: <br /> 1. Inadequate Water Pollution Controls <br /> The application fails to provide a comprehensive plan for controlling water pollution during active mining and <br /> post-mining reclamation. Under the Colorado Water Quality Control Act, mining operations are required to detail <br /> specific measures to protect both surface and groundwater resources.Without such details,it is difficult to verify <br /> that the project will comply with state-mandated water quality standards. <br /> 2. Insufficient Detail on Ore Handling and Transportation <br /> The proposal lacks clarity regarding how the ore will be processed,transported,and stored on site.Colorado's <br /> regulatory framework—including provisions under the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act—mandates that <br /> applicants present robust risk management plans for ore handling.The absence of this information raises <br /> serious questions about the potential for environmental contamination and public safety hazards. <br /> 3. Incomplete Hydrological Impact Assessment <br /> A thorough analysis of the local surface hydrology is essential to understand the impact of mining on drainage <br /> systems and nearby water bodies.The current application does not provide adequate detail regarding the <br /> area's hydrology,which is a critical component required by state environmental management laws to assess <br /> and mitigate adverse impacts. <br /> 4.Ambiguous Milling Operations and Reclamation Planning <br /> While the application references an on-site milling operation, it does not offer sufficient detail on the <br /> environmental impacts associated with this process or the reclamation measures that will be implemented. <br /> Under Colorado law, reclamation plans must be fully integrated with financial assurances to ensure complete <br /> and effective restoration of the mined land.The lack of detail in these areas is deeply concerning. <br /> 5. Unaddressed Wildfire and Emergency Response Risks <br /> Given that the mine is located in an area with one of the highest wildfire risks in the state,the absence of <br /> detailed emergency response protocols—particularly regarding the handling of explosives and the mitigation of <br /> ignition sources—is unacceptable.State emergency planning requirements demand that such risks be clearly <br /> identified and managed to protect both residents and the environment. <br /> In summary,the current application does not meet the statutory requirements set forth by Colorado's <br /> environmental and public safety regulations. I urge the reviewing agency to require a revised application that <br /> fully addresses these legal and technical deficiencies before any permits are granted. Ensuring that all aspects <br /> of water quality protection,ore handling, hydrological assessment,milling operations, reclamation planning,and <br /> emergency response are comprehensively addressed is essential to safeguard our community and the <br /> environment. <br /> Thank you for your careful consideration. <br /> Permitting Action Comment/Objection is Regarding <br /> • New Permit Change to Existing Permit <br /> Permit Number* (?) <br /> Enter a valid permit number <br /> M1977410 <br /> County* <br /> Colorado County where the proposed operation is located <br /> boulder <br /> Enter one county only <br /> Site Name <br /> Cross gold mine <br />