My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DRMS Comment Objection Intake - DEV 3/26/2025 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M1977410
>
DRMS Comment Objection Intake - DEV 3/26/2025 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2025 9:54:47 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 10:06:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977410
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
3/26/2025
Doc Name
Comment/Objection
From
Josh Stanfield
To
DRMS
Email Name
JPL
JPL
Media Type
D
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Your City* <br /> Nederland <br /> Your State <br /> c0 <br /> Your Zip Code <br /> Maximum of 10 digits. (Example)80202 <br /> 80466 <br /> Email Address <br /> Enter a valid email address in this field to receive a confirmation e-mail. <br /> p5k6@yahoo.com <br /> Your Phone Number* (') <br /> Used only to follow up. <br /> 7034930428 <br /> Extension <br /> Alternate Phone Number(?) <br /> Used only to follow up. <br /> Alternate Phone Extension <br /> Connection to Operation <br /> Select all that apply <br /> Land Owner of affected land Structure Owner within 200' of affected land <br /> Mineral Owner ✓ Nearby Resident <br /> Adjacent Land Owner ✓ Concerned Citizen <br /> Government Agency ✓ Other Recreation user within 200'of new <br /> boundaries <br /> DESCRIPTION OF COMMENT OR OBJECTION <br /> You are providing a comment or oojection to the public record of a permitting action currently under review by the Division of <br /> Reclamation, Mining and Safety.This form is not intended for reporting of possible violations or illegal activity. Please be as specific <br /> as possible. <br /> Comment/Objection Narrative <br /> I'm concerned about the expansion of the existing boundaries,and about the potential impacts on the water <br /> supply. <br /> Regarding the first concern-I commonly recreate in national forest land(not on private land!)adjacent to the <br /> new boundaries. I'm concerned about spillover into the forest service land and GIR accidentally making the land <br /> I currently recreate on unsafe.They don't have a great track record so far, post Hendricks'passing. <br /> I'm also concerned about the water supply to Boulder(as I understand things,the water supply to Ned is safe, <br /> though I'm concerned about that as well). My children both go to school in Boulder and I definitely don't want <br /> mine tailings getting into the water supply the drink from during the day <br /> Permitting Action Comment/Objection is Regarding <br /> New Permit Change to Existing Permit <br /> Permit Number* (?) <br /> Enter a valid permit number <br /> M1977410 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.