Laserfiche WebLink
14. The applicant proposes a 100 foot setback from the South Platte River on the north end of Phase <br /> 5. For protection of the riverbank,please review the attached, "Floodplain Protection Standards <br /> for Sand and Gravel Pits Adjacent to Rivers and Perennial Streams". This Guidance document is <br /> based on the MHFD Guidelines. Note that in the scenario where no pitside bank or riverbank <br /> protection is provided, the standard setback from the river or stream is 400 feet. Based on Table <br /> I-Standard Setbacks on Page 3 in the Guidance, the minimum setback from the river is 150 feet <br /> which requires stabilization of the riverbank and pitside banks. Please update the Mining and <br /> Reclamation Plans and maps to describe the stabilization structures that will be installed on the <br /> north side of mining Phases 3 and 5. Resubmit the maps and provide detailed designs of proposed <br /> structures (e.g., riprap, grouted boulders, side channel spillways) to be installed on pitside banks <br /> and riverbanks to control water erosion. <br /> The maps and text have been updated to reflect the standards in this guidance document. The <br /> 150-foot setback has been applied to the eastern-most pit, while the previously proposed <br /> inflow/outflow structure meets the standards for pit-side and bank-side protection. All other <br /> mining has been adjusted to maintain the 400-foot minimum setback that requires no armoring. <br /> Please refer to the updated Map C-2 and Exhibits for these changes in the mining plan. <br /> Exhibit H—Wildlife Information(Rule 6.4.8): <br /> 15. The applicant must address the comments of the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Division (CPW), <br /> which are enclosed with this review letter. Each of the comments must be directly addressed in <br /> your response letter, and, as applicable, comments must also be addressed by revising Exhibit H. <br /> These comments and recommendations are addressed after the DRMS adequacy items. Exhibit <br /> H has been updated to reflect any commitments made in response to the CPW comments. <br /> 16. During the pre-operation inspection, the Division observed prairie dogs in the permit area. <br /> Please address timing considerations related to burrowing owls and update the discussion in <br /> Exhibit Has necessary. <br /> A discussion on the prairie dog presence and burrowing owl considerations have been added to <br /> the revised Exhibit H. <br /> Exhibit M—Other Permits and Licenses (Rule 6.4.13): <br /> 17. Please update the list of permits to include the City of Evans Special Use Permit. <br /> This change has been made in the revised Exhibit M. <br /> Exhibit R—Proof of Filing with County Clerk and Recorder(Rule 6.4.18): <br /> Evans Mining Resource <br /> January 2024 5 Lewicki&Associates <br />