Laserfiche WebLink
Dewatering Evaluation Report <br /> Asphalt Specialties Company,Inc. <br /> Weld County,Colorado <br /> Page 4 <br /> measured water levels (ASCI wells) are presented on Plate 3. The model boundary was <br /> superimposed over a topographic map and the author generated hand drawn contours that best <br /> reflected measured groundwater and surface water elevations. General head boundaries were <br /> assigned to the model perimeter and head elevations were assigned where hand drawn elevations <br /> intersected the model boundary. The model was then run and model predicted heads were <br /> compared to observed heads.This process took three iterations as water table gradients were fairly <br /> uniform throughout the model boundary. After the calibration process was completed the "cell <br /> inspector"function was used to determine the predicted head elevation for model assigned wells. <br /> The head elevations at the model assigned wells prior to any mining activities were used as a <br /> baseline to measure the effects of dewatering and mine slurry wall installations. The calibration <br /> simulation included seepage from the river boundaries which included the South Platte River and <br /> Godfrey Ditch. The calibration simulation is depicted on Plate 4. The model calculated head <br /> values referenced above are depicted on Plate 5. Plate 6 depicts calibration boundary conditions. <br /> To evaluate the effects of the slurry walls on the local groundwater hydrology, barrier walls were <br /> assigned near the excavation limits of the two pits.Two simulations were then run to predict the <br /> effects of the slurry walls on the groundwater hydrology. Plates 7 depicts predicted groundwater <br /> contours for post slurry wall conditions for Phase I mining. Groundwater conditions for Phase II <br /> mining are depicted on Plate 8. Plates 9 and 10 present model predicted water level graphs for <br /> post slurry wall installations. <br /> To simulate the effects of mine dewatering constant head line sinks were assigned to cells within <br /> the pit areas with head values approximately four feet above the bedrock elevation, which <br /> accounts for the predicted seepage face. To account for significant differences in bedrock <br /> elevations linear gradients were assigned to the line sinks where appropriate. Predicted <br /> groundwater contours resulting from mine dewatering are presented on Plates 11 and 12 for <br /> Phase I and Phase II mining. Calibration graphs for the dewatering simulations are presented on <br /> Plates 13 and 14. Tables 1 and 2, presents the predicted water level changes resulting from the <br /> slurry wall installations and dewatering for each of the two mining phases. <br /> Table 1—Phase I Post Slurry Wall Water Levels <br /> MW-1 250 4665.06 4664.74 4666.09* -1.35 1.03 <br /> MW-2 162 4659.00 4658.82 4658.93* -0.11 -0.07 <br /> MW-3 50 4663.04 4663.08 4663.50* -0.42 0.46 <br /> MW-4 488 4660.47 4659.83 4660.11* -0.28 -0.36 <br /> Note- * Denotes water level without dewatering <br />