My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-10-21_INSPECTION - M1983175
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1983175
>
2024-10-21_INSPECTION - M1983175
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2024 7:57:08 AM
Creation date
10/22/2024 7:45:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983175
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
10/21/2024
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Raph Martinez Southwest Ready-Mix, Inc.
Inspection Date
9/5/2024
Email Name
JLE
CMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PERMIT#:M-1983-175 <br /> INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: CMG <br /> INSPECTION DATE: September 5,2024 <br /> OBSERVATIONS <br /> The Alamosa Pit No.2 was inspected by Chris Girardi and Jared Ebert with the Division of Reclamation, Mining, <br /> and Safety (DRMS) as part of the DRMS's routine monitoring inspection program. The site was last inspected <br /> on October 5, 2016, as part of a routine monitoring inspection. Paul Bottini represented Southwest Ready Mix <br /> (Operator) during the inspection. The weather was sunny and windy. <br /> The Alamosa Pit No.2 is a 112c sand and gravel operation that consists of 40 acres and is located <br /> approximately 4.5 miles northeast of Alamosa, CO. The approved post-mining land use is wildlife habitat. The <br /> current land uses surrounding the site are industrial and rangeland. <br /> A mine identification sign was located at the entrance to the site in compliance with Rule 3.1.12. The site is <br /> accessed from the eastern side using a gate.The permit boundary is enclosed with a fence. <br /> General Compliance with Mining Plan: <br /> According to the Operator, mining hasn't been conducted in over 20 years. The eastern third of the site <br /> consists of a backfilled pit with rough, undulating topography and minor amounts of vegetation. The <br /> remaining portion of the site consist of several open pits containing groundwater with the surrounding area <br /> consisting of coarse-grained and structural fill material backfilled in the former pits. Thick vegetation has <br /> established in patches throughout the site consisting of a significant amount of noxious weeds.The south- <br /> central portion of the site is currently being used as a processing area for fine-grained material. The <br /> equipment onsite included portable conveyers, a grizzly screener, and two track-mounted dozers. During the <br /> time of inspection, the Operator was processing material that appears to be brought in from off-site.The site <br /> also contained a trailer with oil tanks and empty blue drums that previously contained water for processing. <br /> Several stockpiles of fine-grained material were observed in the western portion of the site. A large stockpile <br /> of tires was observed in the southwest corner of the site (see Photo 14). <br /> The approved mining plan stated that approximately six (6) to nine (9) inches of topsoil was to be stockpiled <br /> along the perimeter of the site. During this inspection, the DRMS did not observe topsoil stockpiles along the <br /> perimeter or any other location at the site. Based on this observation, this is a possible violation of C.R.S. 34- <br /> 32.5-116(4)(g) for failure to remove topsoil and segregate from other spoil and C.R.S. 34-32.5-124 for failure to <br /> comply with the conditions of the permit to stockpile topsoil for reclamation in accordance with the approved <br /> reclamation plan. <br /> The Operator is approved to import inert backfill material from the King Pit for use as backfill. During this <br /> inspection, the DRMS observed rebar, other metal material, a metal drum, wood, plastic and debris scattered <br /> throughout the site (see Photos 2-5). This material appears to be mixed in with structural fill material that is <br /> used to backfill the open groundwater pit excavations at the site. Based on these observations, this is a <br /> possible violation of the following: C.R.S. 34-32.5-116(4)(d) for failure to prevent the release of pollutants to <br /> the groundwater from any materials handled, or disposed of within the permit area; C.R.S. 34-32.5-116(4)(e) <br /> for failure to dispose of refuse in a manner that controls unsightliness or deleterious effects of such refuse; <br /> C.R.S. 34-32.5-116(4)(h) for failure to minimize the disturbance to the hydrologic balance; and C.R.S. 34-32.5- <br /> 124 and Rule 3.1.5(9) for failure to comply with the conditions of a permit to backfill the pits with inert <br /> material in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. Rebar is a solid waste material that is corrosive if <br /> exposed to weathering, and wood is putrescible. Trash was also observed in several areas.The Operator <br /> Page 3 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.