My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-09-16_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981028
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981028
>
2024-09-16_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981028
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2024 8:18:36 AM
Creation date
9/17/2024 7:56:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/16/2024
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Coors Energy Company
Type & Sequence
SL12
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
RDZ
AME
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 5 <br />contradiction between the equation for the Vegetative Cover Standard in the Permit Application Package <br />(PAP) and the one presented in the SL-12 bond release application. The contradiction lies in the use of a <br />negative sign in the equation presented in SL-12 versus the absence of the negative sign in the equation <br />approved in the PAP, which produces a large difference in the resulting y value. If the Division is to use <br />the equation as presented in SL-12, it was recommended that a Minor Revision be submitted to clarify <br />the correct equation to be used for the Vegetative Cover Standard and update the applicable page(s) of <br />the PAP. CEC submitted a Minor Revision on September 13, 2024 (MR-48) to clarify that the correct <br />equation to use for the Vegetative Cover Standard includes the negative sign, as presented in SL -12. <br />MR-48 was issued on September 16, 2024.Therefore, all adequacy items identified in the SL-12 <br />application were addressed by CEC. <br /> <br /> <br />II. CRITERIA AND SCHEDULE FOR BOND RELEASE <br /> <br />PHASE I <br /> <br />Phase I criteria were not evaluated for this bond release application. All parcels requested for Phase <br />II/III bond release in SL-12 have previously been approved for Phase I bond release. <br /> <br />PHASE II <br /> <br />Rule 3.03.1(2)(b) states, "Up to eighty-five percent of the applicable bond amount shall be released upon <br />the establishment of vegetation which supports the approved postmining land use and which meets the <br />approved success standard for cover... based on statistically valid data collected during a single year of <br />the liability period". Regarding Phase II bond release, Rule 3.03.1(3)(b) states, "No more than sixty (60) <br />percent of the bond shall be released so long as the lands to which the release would be ap plicable are <br />contributing suspended solids to streamflow or runoff outside the permit area in excess of premining <br />levels as determined by baseline data or in excess of levels determined on adjacent nonmined areas." <br /> <br />The following information can be found in Section 2.05.4 of the PAP for the Keenesburg Strip Mine. <br /> <br />The approved revegetation plan emphasizes native species planting resulting in a diverse, permanent, <br />effective plant community capable of self-regeneration. <br /> <br />Per the PAP, the required minimum topsoil replacement thickness is 24 inches over much of the site, <br />including Area 30. Area 30 was graded, topsoiled (top-sanded) and seeded in 2006. CEC’s topsoil <br />replacement has been documented by CEC and verified by the Division during previous inspections. <br />During reclamation activities, CEC placed a post with the soil laydown thicknesses marked on the post. <br />Verification of the topsoil laydown consisted of photographing the topsoil thickness against the <br />markings on the post. CEC maintains a notebook with photos, dates, and the location of the topsoil <br />laydown. The particular Division inspection report that verifies topsoil depth at Area 30 is the May 31, <br />2006 report. This report indicates that the depth was 30 inches, which is well above the required <br />minimum depth of 24 inches and acceptable to the Division. <br /> <br />Vegetative cover success is determined by factoring the previous 11 months precipitation data into an <br />approved predictive formula to determine successful vegetative cover in percentage. Areas will be
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.