My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-08-05_REVISION - M1986123 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1986123
>
2024-08-05_REVISION - M1986123 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2025 6:59:13 AM
Creation date
8/5/2024 2:26:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1986123
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/5/2024
Doc Name
Objection
From
Witwer,Oldenbug,Barry & Groom, LLP
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
JPL
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> LETTER TO DRMS REGARDING RECLAMATION OF THE KIRTRIGHT PIT <br /> Version: 6-10-2024, by Linda O'Brien <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> On September 20, 2023, 1 attended a hearing before the DRMS Board where the Board found <br /> that Coulsons had mined outside of their pit boundaries, imposed a penalty of $200,000 (with <br /> all but $4,783.20 suspended), and ordered Coulsons to submit a proposed permit amendment <br /> that only updated the reclamation plan. Coulsons did not submit any proposed amendment <br /> until February 27, 2024, nearly five months after the DRMS Board Hearing. And even though <br /> Coulsons are experienced operators of a large mining company, both their first proposed <br /> amendment application and their second proposal (submitted May 6, 2024) failed to comply <br /> with various DRMS rules and regulations as indicated by two different incompleteness notices <br /> that DRMS had to send out. As a result, it has been well over eight months since the DRMS <br /> Board Hearing, and Coulsons still have not submitted anything that can be considered a <br /> complete amendment application, and Coulsons still have not complied with the Board's <br /> order. <br /> As I understand it, since their application is not considered filed yet, Coulsons should be <br /> submitting revisions following DRMS's Second Incompleteness Notice and no deadline for <br /> objections has even been established yet. But since my home basically sits in the middle of <br /> the Kirtright Pit, I write to try to express my frustrations with the lack of progress and to try to <br /> explain the impact of Coulsons' actions upon our family. But since more revisions are coming, <br /> I reserve the right to amend and supplement the following objections and comments. <br /> EXPECTATIONS OF LAND OWNERS FOR FINISHING THE KIRTRIGHT PIT <br /> As a homeowner and owner of the O'Brien part of the Kirtright Pit, I am relying on DRMS and <br /> Larimer County to adequately oversee the revised reclamation plan. As with all property <br /> owners, we need to feel safe from routine flooding and be able to use the property as <br /> promised in the original plan for pasture and wildlife (not the newly introduced <br /> industrial/commercial). But the land engineer I have had to hire is not convinced the current <br /> plan will keep routine, damaging floodwaters from infiltrating the O'Brien property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.