My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-06-27_BONDING - C1981018
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Bonding
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2024-06-27_BONDING - C1981018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2024 9:41:47 AM
Creation date
7/10/2024 9:39:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Bonding
Doc Date
6/27/2024
Doc Name Note
Findings & Reclamation Cost Estimate
Doc Name
Reclamation Cost Estimate
From
DRMS
To
Blue Mountain Energy, Inc
Type & Sequence
RN8
Email Name
CCW
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
340
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
additional detailed information on the characteristics of the alluvial body and the <br /> availability of sufficient water to support agricultural activities. Based on information <br /> contained in the report and information supplied to the Division by the Meeker Office of <br /> the Soil Conservation Service regarding regional flood irrigation practices, the Division <br /> has made a negative alluvial valley floor determination for those portions of Red Wash <br /> situated within the Deserado Mine permit area. <br /> As such, the findings of the Division regarding the AVF determination for Red Wash and <br /> its associated alluvium are as follows: <br /> Red Wash Alluvial Valley Floor Determination <br /> The Division has determined that Red Wash and its associated alluvium meets the <br /> geomorphic criteria, but not the irrigation requirements of an AVF, as outlined in OSM's <br /> "Alluvial Valley Floor Guidelines" established pursuant to the Surface Mining Control <br /> and Reclamation Act of 1977. <br /> Specifically,pursuant to Rule 2.06.8(3)(c), the Division finds that there is not sufficient <br /> water to support agricultural activities. The Division therefore concludes that Red Wash <br /> is not an Alluvial Valley Floor. <br /> Scullion Gulch <br /> Water Availability Criteria-Artificial Flood Irrigation <br /> As with Red Wash, flow events along Scullion Gulch were monitored using a crest stage <br /> gage. During the two year inventory period conducted by the permittee, only three runoff <br /> events were recorded, the highest event measuring 185 cfs. Again, however, crest-gage <br /> data has only limited application for AVF purposes. The mean annual yield estimations <br /> provided by the permittee are more applicable for identifying the amount of water that <br /> may be expected for Scullion Gulch. The permittee's estimations, derived using <br /> Grunsky's Formula, indicate that the potential average annual water yield from the <br /> Scullion Gulch watershed is 202 acre feet. This corresponds to approximately 0.34 inches <br /> of runoff. The amount of water available annually, as estimated through this method, <br /> indicates that Scullion Gulch warrants further consideration as a potential alluvial valley <br /> floor. <br /> Subirrigation <br /> As with Red Wash,the presence of subirrigation along Scullion Gulch was investigated by <br /> the permittee based on the type of vegetation present along the drainage. The permittee <br /> has identified a big sage brush - greasewood community along the entire length of <br /> unconsolidated alluvial deposits identified on Map 102, and concludes that water is <br /> available to the vegetation "on a limited and sporadic basis". The big sage <br /> brush-greasewood community, however, is more sparse compared to that community <br /> found along Red Wash, indicating that the availability of subsurface water is much more <br /> xxxviii <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.