My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-06-28_REVISION - M1982112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1982112
>
2024-06-28_REVISION - M1982112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2024 8:44:24 AM
Creation date
7/1/2024 8:42:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/28/2024
Doc Name
Request for Technical Revision
From
Mark Heifner
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR6
Email Name
JR2
AME
EL1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Once the pile is removed that land may need to be seeded and it will take two or three seasons for that <br /> vegetation to develop. But it is more likely that the Community Amenity will be constructed. <br /> However, and once again,that has not been planned yet, so it cannot be determined now how this land <br /> will be reclaimed or developed. <br /> One thing is certain. Unnecessary disturbance of the land being reclaimed elsewhere and at this time <br /> in the pit will only serve to extend the time needed to reach a suitable vegetation for release of the <br /> permitted land. It would be best to manage the land adaptively until the future is better known. And <br /> that is also the goal of the current reclamation plan,no matter what the use is, even as a community <br /> amenity. For now it would be best to simply leave the land use as Rangeland and don't make any <br /> changes until it is known what changes are definitely needed. <br /> Materials Contained in the Pile: To determine the nature of the materials composing the pile it was <br /> first inspected from all sides and along the top while looking for any foreign materials (wood, metal, <br /> etc.). None was found. During that inspection the color and texture of the material and its variations <br /> were examined. This was followed by taking samples using a 15 inch soil tube auger. The samples <br /> were deposited into plastic bags and sealed to prevent spillage or accidental mixing. About three <br /> pounds were collected from each of the three units. <br /> Results: No foreign material (metal, wood, asphalt, concrete, etc.)was found incorporated <br /> in the pile. Of course there was no way to examine the inside of the pile,but all the material on the <br /> outside showed no hints of possible hidden material inside the pile. And the Elbert County permit only <br /> allowed clean fill. <br /> The material itself appears to be subsoil as it contains very little evidence of organic <br /> matter and in places shows evidence of three different kinds of materials, based on soil color. <br /> Soil Unit 1. The first unit is a yellowish-tan color and is brighter than soil unit 2. It appears as <br /> if this soil might have originally been below the orange-brown soil and perhaps was a part of the C <br /> horizon. It has the texture of a soil that has had very limited contact with living matter. It probably <br /> came from considerable depth based on the lack of root structures found in the soil. <br /> Page 6 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.