Laserfiche WebLink
3-43b <br /> <br />3.5.3.1 L-Pit and Ash Pit Variance from Approximate Original Contour <br />The final cut of the L Pit and the Ash Pit will be backfilled and graded using the methodologies <br />outlined in Section 3.5 but with a final graded configuration that will vary from approximate <br />original contour or AOC. The projected post-mining topography of the L Pit is shown on Map <br />M12, Postmining Topography, Sheet 3. The projected post-mining topography of the Ash pit is <br />shown on Map M12, Postmining Topography Sheet 2. Cross sections of the pre-mining and <br />post-mining topography are shown on Map M14A Postmining Cross Sections, Sheet 1 for the L- <br />Pit and Sheet 3 for the Ash Pit. <br />Appendix B provides detailed information on the benefits of backfilling and grading of the L Pit <br />and Ash Pit to gentler slopes for both long-term stability and watershed improvement. <br />Permit C-1981-010 Technical Revision 69 cautioned that steep slopes at the Trapper Mine could <br />potentially be anything over 14°, depending on hydrologic or geotechnical conditions. The L Pit <br />overall pre-mining topography exhibited extensive slopes of 16° or steeper, with some slopes as <br />steep as 26° in the southern portion of the L Pit area. Post-mining the slopes will range from 4 <br />to 14° and will blend with the surrounding topography. The post-mining backfill configuration <br />for the L Pit will decrease the depth of spoil placed at the head of the slope and increase the <br />depth of spoil placed at the toe of the slope to act as a buttress to any movement. Overall <br />surface topography that is less steep will also increase the stability of the backfilled spoil. The <br />stability analysis (App. B, Attachment 1,) showed that the post-mining stability for the AOC <br />variance improved Safety Factors when compared to restoring the L Pit to AOC. <br />Further, post-mining drainage density and slope have been designed to approximate the pre- <br />mining drainage distribution. The AOC variance drainage design will result in overall watershed <br />improvement. For the L Pit, the drainage area for Flume Gulch, which is the major drainage <br />associated with the L Pit, will increase by approximately 205.7 acres or 9.9%. The post-mining <br />drainage densities will increase by 0.1%, and the overall drainage gradient will remain the <br />same. Sediment yield will decrease from 1.13 tons/acre to 0.80 tons/acre under the proposed <br />post-mining configuration. <br />The table 3.5-1 summarizes the pre- and post-mining characteristics for the L Pit. <br />Table 3.5-1 Pre- and Post-Mining Characteristics for the L Pit <br />Condition Acreage Slopes (°) Safety <br />Factors <br />Drainage <br />Density <br />(mi/mi2) <br />Gradient <br />(%) <br />Sediment <br />Yield <br />Per Acre <br />(tons) <br />Pre-Mining 1,877.5 4-26 1.3 to 1.5 3.8 10.6 1.13 <br />Post-Mining 2,083.2 4-14 1.58 to 2.14 3.9 10.6 0.80 <br />