My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-05-21_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2024-05-21_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2025 11:39:32 AM
Creation date
6/21/2024 8:51:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/21/2024
Doc Name
pgs 3-1 to 3-101
Section_Exhibit Name
3.0 Project Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The M12 series of maps depicts the planned Post Mining Topography. The topography depicted meets the <br />definition of approximate original contour, per Statute 34-33-103(3) and Regulation 1.04(13). The proposed <br />topography closely resembles the general surface configuration of the land prior to mining, and blends into <br />and complements the drainage pattern of the surrounding terrain. The variance of post mining elevations <br />and pre-mining elevations are consistent with Trapper’s prior, and successful, reclamation efforts. As such, <br />the Horse Gulch fill qualifies as excess spoil, as defined by Regulation 1.04(45a). This fill was left as a <br />permanent reclamation feature, consistent with the planned post mining land use of Rangeland and Wildlife <br />Habitat. <br /> <br />The fill was constructed with overburden, as defined by Regulation 1.04(83). Neither coal mine waste, as <br />defined by Regulation 1.04(22a), nor coal processing waste, as defined by Regulation 1.04(24), were used <br />in the construction of the fill. Topsoil was stripped and salvaged prior to construction, and no organic <br />material was used in its construction. <br /> <br />The Horse Gulch area was chosen for excess spoil placement because the area contained neither <br />ephemeral streams, as defined in Regulation 1.04(42), nor intermittent streams, as defined by Regulation <br />1.04(69). This location allowed construction of a head of hollow fill, as defined by Regulation 1.04(56), <br />which blends with the surrounding topography. Detailed cross sections can be found in Appendix T. <br /> <br />The hydrologic balance, as defined by Regulation 1.04(61), is protected with this mine plan. There is no <br />discernible change in the quality or quantity of water inflow to our outflow of the Yampa River Basin. <br /> <br />The final cut in any given pit may be open for as long as 18 months as the need to remove coal to allow for <br />continuous stripping operations is not a factor. Final cuts are a logical area to carry inventory. <br /> <br />Due to spoil side stripping techniques employed at Trapper, extra room is needed to effectively place the <br />spoils. Taking into consideration that the shortest cycle time in a down-dip dragline operation leaves the pit <br />active for up to 230 days and that the interburden will be cast as far as three previous cuts, it is not possible <br />to regrade the spoils within 180 days after coal removal. For Trapper Mine's contemporaneous regrade <br />criteria, grading will progress such that there will be no more than three un-regraded spoil rows, including <br />the active spoil row, at any one time in each pit. A pictorial view of the double pass stripping operation is <br />shown in Figure 3.5-1. This figure presents a simplification of the Trapper stripping operation and shows <br />graphically why three spoil rows are required. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />3-39
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.