My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-03-29_REVISION - M1982121 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1982121
>
2024-03-29_REVISION - M1982121 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2024 7:50:53 PM
Creation date
3/29/2024 5:07:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982121
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/29/2024
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
RMR Aggregates, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KILDUFF RMR Aggregates, Inc. <br /> u N D E R G R D U N C Rock Failure Analyses and Stabilization Report <br /> E N G I N E E R I N G.I N C Mid Continent Limestone Quarry <br /> and kinematic conditions for sliding. This point must fall outside the cut slope's great circle but within <br /> the rock friction kinematic boundary cone to be considered to have the potential for wedge sliding <br /> (red-shaded area in Appendix C figures). The thin interbed of shaley mudstone observed along some <br /> of the limestone bedding planes creates a potential failure plane of lesser cohesion and fiction angle <br /> than the limestone. Stability modeling was completed to evaluate this geometry for potential failure. <br /> 4. STABILITY MODELING ANALYSES OF FAILURE MODES <br /> Long Term Steady-State stability analyses along the cut slopes were performed to evaluate the <br /> potential bedrock failures along discontinuities in the rock mass. Results from these analyses were <br /> used to evaluate the cause of failure on the West wall and informed the conceptual design and <br /> mitigation support for the East and West faces. General limit equilibrium method slope stability <br /> analyses for the East and West face were performed using the software program RocPlane from <br /> RocScience (v.4.011). A factor of safety is calculated by modeling the effects of joint shear strength (in <br /> this case, primarily the weak interbed), water pressure within the joint,joint orientation and slope <br /> geometry intersections within a Monte Carlo sampling method.The models were checked by the limit <br /> equilibrium method of slices (Morgenstern-Price) using the software program Slope/W from <br /> Geostudio 2023.1. Using this methodology, the factor of safety for a given geometry is determined by <br /> calculating the ratio of resisting forces to driving forces on trial failure surfaces. Slip surface scenarios <br /> analyzed for this report were block specified.The slip surface with the lowest factor of safety against <br /> sliding is described as the minimum factor of safety for the defined conditions. The Long Term <br /> Steady-State was analyzed to consider the extended term stability of the highwall, and the rock <br /> strength is characterized by effective stress parameters. <br /> To determine the geologic input parameters for the Mid-Continent Limestone Quarry stability <br /> modeling, characteristic values of the Leadville limestone were initially taken from empirical data in <br /> peer-reviewed publications and verified by publicly available typical values for the units encountered <br /> on the slope. Based on tests performed by the United States Bureau of Reclamation' on the Leadville <br /> Limestone in the Paradox Valley, the friction angle of the limestone is approximately 40 degrees, and <br /> the cohesion is approximately 3,050 psi. CaltranS6 estimates for hard rock masses, like limestone, the <br /> friction angle of the rock mass varies from 35 degrees to 45 degrees and the friction angle of the joint <br /> areas can vary from 35 degrees to 40 degrees. No site-specific strength testing has been completed. <br /> Mohr-Coulomb strength criterion framework was utilized to define bedrock and joint material <br /> strengths. Mohr-Coulomb assumes an inherent cohesion in over-consolidated fine-grained or <br /> cemented soils and bedrock. And finally, a back analysis of the West face ground event was used to <br /> corroborate these empirical values. The West face stability analyses parameters were manipulated to <br /> achieve a Factor of Safety (FOS) of less than 1.0, in both RocPlane (FOS 0.99) and checked in Slope/W <br /> (FOS 0.92), indicating probable failure (Appendix D). Initially the back analysis in RocPlane considered <br /> 5 Ake, J., Mahrer, K., O'Connell, D., Block, L., 2005, Deep Injection and Closely Monitored Induced Seismicity at <br /> Paradox Valley, Colorado., United States Bureau of Reclamation. <br /> 6 California Department of Transportation., 2013, Rock Strength and Its Measurements. <br /> Page 6 <br /> 535 16th STREET,SUITE 620 1 DENVER,CO 80202 1 (303)732-3692 1 WWW.KILDUFFUNDERGROUND.COM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.