My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-03-29_REVISION - M1982121 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1982121
>
2024-03-29_REVISION - M1982121 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2024 7:50:53 PM
Creation date
3/29/2024 5:07:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982121
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/29/2024
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
RMR Aggregates, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KIL D UFF4L RMR Aggregates,Inc. <br /> U N U E R 3 R G U N E. Rock Failure Analyses and Stabilization Report <br /> ENGINEER IN G,INC. Mid Continent Limestone Quarry <br /> and lower limestone slope heights ranging from 5 feet to 15 feet were modeled to determine the <br /> resisting force required to reach a FOS of 1.5 static and 1.3 seismic. <br /> Several mechanical stabilization methods were considered, ultimately a 7-strand anchorage was <br /> selected for both logistical purposes and the stand lengths can be changed to accommodate longer <br /> lengths for this difficult to reach location. In some modeled instances,the upper and lower limestone <br /> could exceed greater than 10 ft thickness which would require a long total length of 45 feet. Given <br /> the load and lengths necessary, a traditional bar would be exceptionally long requiring coupled bars <br /> and likely a crane, becoming logistically cumbersome. A concrete bollard with tie backs was also <br /> considered and has been effectively used locally. However, the concrete bollard would require either <br /> pumping concrete from the base or gravity feed from above. Neither are logistically realistic for the <br /> as-needed local stabilization approach.The 6-inch hole could only be reduced in diameter if the <br /> number of strands was reduced, requiring much longer bond lengths per strand, much longer strands <br /> and therefore a much longer drill hole.The longer drill hole would require a much larger drill rig. <br /> Due to the 6-inch hole diameter and depths required, a berm is needed to resist the upper and/or <br /> lower limestone beds from failing and to be used as a work bench to install the required anchors. <br /> Table 7 below provides details of the necessary anchorage, hole diameter and lengths. <br /> Table 7a. Summary of Required Anchor Stabilization 1,3 <br /> Upper& Lower Vertical Horizontal Hale <br /> Limestone Anchorage Spacing Spacing Diameter <br /> Height (ft) (ft) (ft) (in) <br /> 10-15 8 strand 10 10 6 <br /> 5-10 6 strand - 10 6 <br /> 0-5 4 strand - 30 6 <br /> Table 7b.Summary of Required Anchor Stabilization 1.3 <br /> Upper& Lower Bond Free Tail Total Lock off <br /> Limestone Length Length Length length Load <br /> Height(ft) (ft) (ft)Z (ft) (ft) (kips) <br /> 10-15 18 15 2 35 345 <br /> 5-10 13 15 2 30 250 <br /> 0-5 8 15 2 25 185 <br /> Notes: <br /> 1.Lengths shown are the minimum lengths required. <br /> 2. Minimum free length per PTI is 15 feet. <br /> 3. Data presented is a preliminary design. Final design of the anchorage system will need <br /> to be performed if required on site. <br /> In order to achieve a higher factor of safety, K U E recommends horizontal drains to be installed <br /> through the joint of the upper and lower limestone if active support is required onsite. <br /> Page 16 <br /> 535160'STREET,SUITE 620 1 DENVER,Co 80202 1 (303)732-3692 1 WWW.KILDUFFUNDERGROUND.COM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.